Ferrara Philippe, Jacoby Edgar
Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Discovery Technologies, Basel, Switzerland.
J Mol Model. 2007 Aug;13(8):897-905. doi: 10.1007/s00894-007-0207-6. Epub 2007 May 9.
High throughput docking (HTD) is routinely used for in silico screening of compound libraries with the aim to find novel leads in a drug discovery program. In the absence of an experimentally determined structure, a homology model can be used instead. Here we present an assessment of the utility of homology models in HTD by docking 300,000 anticipated inactive compounds along with 642 known actives into the binding site of the insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor (IGF-1R) kinase constructed by homology modeling. Twenty-one different templates were selected and the enrichment curves obtained by the homology models were compared to those obtained by three IGF-1R crystal structures. The results show a wide range of enrichments from random to as good as two of the three IGF-1R crystal structures. Nevertheless, if we consider the enrichment obtained at 2% of the database screened as a performance criterion, the best crystal structure outperforms the best homology model. Surprisingly, the sequence identity of the template to the target is not a good descriptor to predict the enrichment obtained by a homology model. The three homology models that yield the worst enrichment have the smallest binding-site volume. Based on our results, we propose ensemble docking to perform HTD with homology models.
高通量对接(HTD)通常用于化合物库的虚拟筛选,目的是在药物发现计划中找到新的先导化合物。在没有实验确定的结构的情况下,可以使用同源模型代替。在此,我们通过将300,000种预期无活性的化合物以及642种已知活性化合物对接至通过同源建模构建的胰岛素样生长因子1受体(IGF-1R)激酶的结合位点,对同源模型在HTD中的实用性进行了评估。选择了21种不同的模板,并将同源模型获得的富集曲线与三种IGF-1R晶体结构获得的富集曲线进行了比较。结果显示,富集程度范围广泛,从随机水平到与三种IGF-1R晶体结构中的两种相当。然而,如果我们将在筛选的数据库的2%时获得的富集作为性能标准,最佳晶体结构优于最佳同源模型。令人惊讶的是,模板与靶标的序列同一性并不是预测同源模型获得的富集的良好描述符。产生最差富集的三种同源模型具有最小的结合位点体积。基于我们的结果,我们建议使用集成对接与同源模型一起进行HTD。