• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

远程医疗技术评估第二部分:质量控制系统工具

Telemedicine technology assessment part II: tools for a quality control system.

作者信息

Giansanti Daniele, Morelli Sandra, Macellari Velio

机构信息

Technologies and Health Department, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Telemed J E Health. 2007 Apr;13(2):130-40. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2006.9988.

DOI:10.1089/tmj.2006.9988
PMID:17489699
Abstract

Because no study has been done so far that fully assesses all the aspects that concur to achieve the quality of telemedicine applications, the authors propose a set of tools and procedures for Telemedicine Quality Control. A set of quality control procedures were developed in order to furnish tools to assess telemedicine products and/or services. The procedures were then submitted to manufacturers of telemedicine applications. An Informative Questionnaire and a Classification Form were specifically designed for maximizing the acquisition of data on the products/services. The other tools, a Technical File and a Quality Assessment Checklist (QACL), were intended to both evaluate and improve the quality of the telemedicine applications. The tools were continuously upgraded according to the manufacturer's suggestions. Because of the synergy that ensued, each tool was designed to cover a wide range of aspects for the evaluation of the telemedicine products and services. Thus, the Informative Questionnaire became the core tool for acquiring the information, whereas the QACL was the core evaluation tool. The proposed tools have been used in an integrated manner, and constitute a full quality control process for the assessment of telemedicine products.

摘要

由于目前尚未有研究全面评估影响远程医疗应用质量的所有方面,作者提出了一套远程医疗质量控制的工具和程序。为了提供评估远程医疗产品和/或服务的工具,制定了一套质量控制程序。这些程序随后提交给远程医疗应用制造商。专门设计了一份信息问卷和一份分类表,以最大限度地获取有关产品/服务的数据。其他工具,即技术文件和质量评估清单(QACL),旨在评估和提高远程医疗应用的质量。这些工具根据制造商的建议不断升级。由于产生了协同作用,每个工具都旨在涵盖远程医疗产品和服务评估的广泛方面。因此,信息问卷成为获取信息的核心工具,而QACL是核心评估工具。所提出的工具已被综合使用,并构成了评估远程医疗产品的完整质量控制过程。

相似文献

1
Telemedicine technology assessment part II: tools for a quality control system.远程医疗技术评估第二部分:质量控制系统工具
Telemed J E Health. 2007 Apr;13(2):130-40. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2006.9988.
2
Telemedicine technology assessment part I: setup and validation of a quality control system.远程医疗技术评估 第一部分:质量控制系统的建立与验证
Telemed J E Health. 2007 Apr;13(2):118-29. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2008.9963.
3
Experience at Italian National Institute of Health in the quality control in telemedicine: tools for gathering data information and quality assessing.意大利国家卫生研究院在远程医疗质量控制方面的经验:数据信息收集与质量评估工具
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2007;2007:2803-6. doi: 10.1109/IEMBS.2007.4352911.
4
Experience at Italian National Institute of Health in the assessment of the quality in telemedicine: submission to a quality control process.意大利国立卫生研究院在远程医疗质量评估方面的经验:提交质量控制流程。
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2007;2007:3725-8. doi: 10.1109/IEMBS.2007.4353141.
5
Quality assessment and cataloguing of telemedicine applications.远程医疗应用的质量评估与编目
J Telemed Telecare. 2006;12(4):189-93. doi: 10.1258/135763306777488735.
6
The patient's perspective in the Dutch National Technical Agreement on Telemedicine.
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2008;137:26-33.
7
A novel codification scheme based on the "VITAL" and "DICOM" Standards for telemedicine applications.一种基于“VITAL”和“DICOM”标准的用于远程医疗应用的新型编码方案。
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2002 Dec;49(12):1399-411. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2002.805458.
8
Virtual reality as telemedicine tool: technology, ergonomics and actual applications.虚拟现实作为远程医疗工具:技术、人体工程学及实际应用
Technol Health Care. 2000;8(2):113-27.
9
Telemedicine in oncology: European perspective.肿瘤学中的远程医疗:欧洲视角
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2008;131:255-61.
10
Health systems evaluation of telemedicine: a staged approach.远程医疗的卫生系统评估:一种分阶段方法。
Telemed J. 1996 Winter;2(4):303-12. doi: 10.1089/tmj.1.1996.2.303.

引用本文的文献

1
Methodological Frameworks and Dimensions to Be Considered in Digital Health Technology Assessment: Scoping Review and Thematic Analysis.数字健康技术评估中需要考虑的方法学框架和维度:范围综述和主题分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Apr 10;26:e48694. doi: 10.2196/48694.
2
Under the Tech Umbrella: Assessing the Landscape of Telemedicine Innovations (Telemechron Study).在科技保护伞下:评估远程医疗创新的现状(远程医疗时间研究)
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Mar 8;12(6):615. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12060615.
3
WhatsApp in : design and evaluation of an tool to share dynamic images in hemodynamics.
WhatsApp介入:一种用于在血流动力学中共享动态图像的工具的设计与评估。
Mhealth. 2021 Jan 20;7:9. doi: 10.21037/mhealth-19-187. eCollection 2021.
4
A smartphone-based survey in mHealth to investigate the introduction of the artificial intelligence into cardiology.一项基于智能手机的移动健康调查,旨在研究人工智能在心脏病学中的应用。
Mhealth. 2021 Jan 20;7:8. doi: 10.21037/mhealth-19-188. eCollection 2021.
5
WhatsApp in : an overview on the potentialities and the opportunities in medical imaging.WhatsApp介入:医学成像领域的潜力与机遇概述
Mhealth. 2020 Apr 5;6:19. doi: 10.21037/mhealth.2019.11.01. eCollection 2020.
6
Integration of tablet technologies in the e-laboratory of cytology: a health technology assessment.平板电脑技术在细胞病理学电子实验室中的整合:一项卫生技术评估。
Telemed J E Health. 2014 Oct;20(10):909-15. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2013.0235.
7
Objective video quality measure for application to tele-echocardiography.用于远程超声心动图的客观视频质量测量。
Med Biol Eng Comput. 2008 Aug;46(8):807-13. doi: 10.1007/s11517-008-0364-5. Epub 2008 Jul 10.