Brinton B, Fujiki M
Bureau of Child Research, University of Kansas.
J Speech Hear Res. 1991 Oct;34(5):1087-95. doi: 10.1044/jshr.3405.1087.
This study focused on adjustments made in conversation in response to listener feedback. Subjects consisted of 22 community-based and 22 institutionalized adults with mental retardation individually matched for full-scale IQ. For each subject, data were collected in a dyadic conversation with an investigator. During the course of the conversation, the investigator introduced stacked sequences of three requests for clarification of the same message ("Huh?" "What?" "What?"). Each subject's responses to these requests were analyzed. Results indicated that community-based subjects used certain sophisticated repair strategies more often than did their institutionalized peers. However, neither group of subjects was as responsive to the requests for clarification as would have been predicted considering their general levels of intellectual and linguistic functioning.
本研究聚焦于对话中根据听众反馈所做的调整。研究对象包括22名社区成年人和22名机构化的智力障碍成年人，他们在全量表智商方面进行了个体匹配。对于每位研究对象，数据收集于与一名研究者进行的二元对话中。在对话过程中，研究者提出了针对同一信息的三个澄清请求的堆叠序列（“嗯？”“什么？”“什么？”）。分析了每位研究对象对这些请求的回应。结果表明，社区成年人比机构化的同龄人更频繁地使用某些复杂的修复策略。然而，考虑到他们的智力和语言功能的总体水平，两组研究对象对澄清请求的反应都不如预期的那样灵敏。
