Castellani Rudy J, Zhu Xiongwei, Lee Hyoung-gon, Moreira Paula I, Perry George, Smith Mark A
University of Maryland, Department of Pathology, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.
Expert Rev Neurother. 2007 May;7(5):473-85. doi: 10.1586/14737175.7.5.473.
Although amyloid-beta-containing senile plaques and phospho-tau containing neurofibrillary tangles are hallmark lesions of Alzheimer disease (AD), neither is specific for AD, nor even a marker of AD. Rather, they are empirical lesions that require close correlation with age and clinical signs for optimal interpretation. In essence, these lesions represent the effect rather than the cause of disease. In this review, we discuss diagnostic criteria for AD, the relationship between pathology, pathogenesis and multiple treatment approaches that have so far been disappointing, including those that presume to address pathological lesions. An acceptance that lesion-based therapies do not address etiology or rate-limiting pathogenic factors is probably necessary for the best chance of significant advances that have thus far been elusive.
尽管含有β-淀粉样蛋白的老年斑和含有磷酸化tau蛋白的神经原纤维缠结是阿尔茨海默病(AD)的标志性病变,但两者都不是AD所特有的,甚至也不是AD的标志物。相反,它们是经验性病变,需要与年龄和临床体征密切相关才能进行最佳解读。从本质上讲,这些病变代表的是疾病的结果而非病因。在本综述中,我们讨论了AD的诊断标准、病理学、发病机制与多种治疗方法之间的关系,这些治疗方法目前都令人失望,包括那些旨在解决病理病变的方法。要想有机会取得迄今为止难以实现的重大进展,可能有必要承认基于病变的疗法无法解决病因或限速致病因素。