Gauvrit J-Y, Law M, Xu J, Carson R, Sunenshine P, Chen Q
Department of Neuroradiology, EA 2691, Salengro Hospital, University Hospital of Lille, Lille, France.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2007 May;28(5):835-8.
Time-resolved (TR) MR angiography (MRA) using parallel imaging techniques is proving to have clinical utility for improving MRA spatial and temporal resolution and separating arterial from venous anatomy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate TR MRA of the intracranial vessels at different integrated parallel acquisition technique (IPAT) factors.
3D TR MRA using time-resolved echo-shared angiographic technique was performed with different IPAT factors (0, 2, 3) at 1.5 T, resulting in temporal resolutions of 4.0, 1.7, and 1.3 seconds, respectively. We studied 14 subjects, comprising 12 patients with various pathologic conditions and 2 healthy subjects. The brain volume was covered by 36 partitions, and a bolus of 5 mL of gadopentate dimeglumine was administered. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), the number of frames that distinguished between arterial and venous phases, the conspicuity of the vasculature, and artifacts were analyzed.
There was no significant difference in SNR between IPAT factors 0 and 2. Moreover, SNR was significantly lower with IPAT 3 than with IPAT 0 or 2. Smaller vessel segments (M3 and P3) were rated significantly inferior with TR MRA IPAT 2 or 3 compared with MRA without IPAT. For larger proximal vessels (A1 and A2 segments of anterior cerebral artery, M1 and M2 segments of middle cerebral artery, P2 segment of posterior cerebral artery, and basilar artery), there was no difference between TR MRA IPAT 0 and 2.
To obtain arterial and venous information in a clinical setting, intracranial TR MRA is best performed with an IPAT factor of 2 with at least 5 mL of contrast.
使用并行成像技术的时间分辨(TR)磁共振血管造影(MRA)已被证明在提高MRA的空间和时间分辨率以及区分动脉与静脉解剖结构方面具有临床应用价值。本研究的目的是评估在不同的集成并行采集技术(IPAT)因子下颅内血管的TR MRA。
在1.5 T场强下,使用时间分辨回波共享血管造影技术进行3D TR MRA,采用不同的IPAT因子(0、2、3),分别得到时间分辨率为4.0、1.7和1.3秒。我们研究了14名受试者,包括12名患有各种病理状况的患者和2名健康受试者。脑容积被分为36个分区,并静脉注射5 mL钆喷酸葡胺。分析了信噪比(SNR)、对比噪声比(CNR)、区分动脉期和静脉期的帧数、血管系统的清晰度以及伪影。
IPAT因子0和2之间的SNR无显著差异。此外,IPAT 3时的SNR显著低于IPAT 0或2时。与无IPAT的MRA相比,TR MRA IPAT 2或3时较小的血管段(M3和P3)评分显著较低。对于较大的近端血管(大脑前动脉的A1和A2段、大脑中动脉的M1和M2段、大脑后动脉的P2段以及基底动脉),TR MRA IPAT 0和2之间无差异。
为在临床环境中获取动脉和静脉信息,颅内TR MRA最好采用IPAT因子为2并至少使用5 mL造影剂进行检查。