Cohen J M, Waiss B
College of Optometry, State University of New York, New York.
Optom Vis Sci. 1991 Oct;68(10):795-7. doi: 10.1097/00006324-199110000-00007.
Adequate reading speed is one of the criteria low vision patients may use to assist them when they are comparing and selecting equivalent power low vision devices. Inherently, various optical devices of equivalent power will produce different fields of view. We compared the reading speed of 32 trained, normal observers with 4 commonly prescribed types of low vision devices of +12 D equivalent power (spectacles, hand magnifier, stand magnifier, and telemicroscope) which were modified to provide nearly identical fields of view. Our results show that only the reading speed obtained with the telemicroscope was significantly different from those of the other systems (p less than 0.01). Implications are that the field of view provided by a low vision device is the primary parameter limiting reading speed of equivalent power devices.
足够的阅读速度是低视力患者在比较和选择等效屈光度低视力设备时可用于辅助自己的标准之一。本质上,等效屈光度的各种光学设备会产生不同的视野。我们将32名经过训练的正常观察者使用4种等效屈光度为+12 D的常用低视力设备(眼镜、手持放大镜、台式放大镜和望远显微镜)的阅读速度进行了比较,这些设备经过改装以提供几乎相同的视野。我们的结果表明,只有使用望远显微镜获得的阅读速度与其他系统的阅读速度有显著差异(p小于0.01)。这意味着低视力设备提供的视野是限制等效屈光度设备阅读速度的主要参数。