Fink Bernd, Grossmann Alexandra, Schubring Svenja, Schulz Martin S, Fuerst Martin
Department of Joint Replacement, General and Rheumatic Ortho paedics, Orthopaedic Clinic Markgröningen gGmbH, Markgröningen, Germany.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007 Sep;462:105-14. doi: 10.1097/BLO.0b013e3180986170.
The transfemoral approach in its traditional form, using a nonmodular Wagner self-locking revision stem, has the disadvantages of a less predictable union rate of the bony flap and a high rate of stem subsidence. To investigate whether this situation can be improved by using a modified transfemoral approach and modular curved cementless revision stems, we prospectively analyzed 68 hip revisions and followed them clinically and radiographically for a minimum of 24 months (mean +/- standard deviation, 32.4 +/- 11.2 months). One year after the operation, the osteotomy showed bony consolidation in all but one case (98.5%). We noted subsidence in six cases (8.8%) and two of these stems became loose. In all of these cases, the circular fixation zone of the stem in the isthmus of the femur was less than 3 cm. The Harris hip score improved continuously from 41.4 +/- 14.5 points preoperatively to 85.9 +/- 14.6 points 24 months postoperatively. The modified transfemoral approach in combination with a curved, modular revision stem showed reproducibly good results concerning union of the bony flap and subsidence of the stem if the fixation zone was not less than 3 cm.
传统形式的经股入路,使用非模块化的瓦格纳自锁翻修柄,存在骨瓣愈合率难以预测以及柄下沉率高的缺点。为了研究使用改良经股入路和模块化弯形非骨水泥翻修柄是否能改善这种情况,我们前瞻性分析了68例髋关节翻修病例,并对其进行了至少24个月的临床和影像学随访(平均±标准差,32.4±11.2个月)。术后一年,除1例(98.5%)外,截骨处均显示骨愈合。我们发现6例(8.8%)出现下沉,其中2个柄松动。在所有这些病例中,柄在股骨峡部的环形固定区均小于3 cm。Harris髋关节评分从术前的41.4±14.5分持续提高到术后24个月的85.9±14.6分。如果固定区不小于3 cm,改良经股入路联合弯形模块化翻修柄在骨瓣愈合和柄下沉方面可重复地显示出良好效果。