Suppr超能文献

全髋关节置换术感染性二期翻修中定制间隔物的新技术

New Technique for Custom-Made Spacers in Septic Two-Stage Revision of Total Hip Arthroplasties.

作者信息

Mederake Moritz, Hofmann Ulf Krister, Fink Bernd

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospital Tübingen, Hoppe Seyler-Str. 3, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.

Department of Arthroplasty and Revision Arthroplasty, Orthopaedic Clinic Markgröningen GmbH, Kurt-Lindemann-Weg 10, 71706 Markgröningen, Germany.

出版信息

Antibiotics (Basel). 2021 Sep 4;10(9):1073. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10091073.

Abstract

The choice of spacer in the interim phase of two-stage revision hip arthroplasty is crucial. Conventional concepts like a Girdlestone situation, handformed or preformed bone cement spacers show complications like soft-tissue contractions, abrasion of bone cement particles, dislocation, breakage and a low level of mobility in the interim phase. To address these disadvantages, the senior author developed a new technique for custom-made spacers in septic two-stage revision of total hip arthroplasties using prosthetic implants with individualized antibiotic mixture in the cement applying a mechanical inferior cementation method. The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of these spacers with respect to their non-inferiority in terms of reinfection and survival-rate of the new implant and to describe the complications associated with this procedure. Our collective consisted of 130 patients with a median follow-up of nearly five years. With a reinfect-free rate of 92% and a spacer-related complication rate of 10% (8% articular dislocation, 1% periprosthetic joint fracture, 1% breakage), this procedure seems to be safe and superior regarding complications compared to conventional concepts. Further studies are necessary to show the clinical benefit of this procedure.

摘要

两阶段翻修髋关节置换术过渡阶段间隔物的选择至关重要。诸如吉尔德斯通(Girdlestone)情况、手工制作或预制骨水泥间隔物等传统概念在过渡阶段存在软组织挛缩、骨水泥颗粒磨损、脱位、断裂以及活动度低等并发症。为解决这些缺点,资深作者开发了一种新技术,用于在全髋关节置换术的感染性两阶段翻修中定制间隔物,在骨水泥中使用含个体化抗生素混合物的假体植入物,并采用机械性低位骨水泥固定方法。本研究的目的是评估这些间隔物在再感染和新植入物生存率方面的非劣效性结果,并描述与该手术相关的并发症。我们的研究对象包括130例患者,中位随访时间近五年。再感染率为92%,间隔物相关并发症发生率为10%(关节脱位8%、假体周围骨折1%、断裂1%),与传统概念相比,该手术在并发症方面似乎更安全且更具优势。需要进一步研究以证明该手术的临床益处。

相似文献

1
New Technique for Custom-Made Spacers in Septic Two-Stage Revision of Total Hip Arthroplasties.
Antibiotics (Basel). 2021 Sep 4;10(9):1073. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10091073.
2
Clinical evaluation of a new technique for custom-made spacers in septic two-stage revision of total hip arthroplasties.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Aug;143(8):5395-5403. doi: 10.1007/s00402-022-04748-z. Epub 2023 Jan 5.
5
The Influence of Spacer Design on the Rate of Complications in Two-Stage Revision Hip Arthroplasty.
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Jun;34(6):1201-1206. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.02.012. Epub 2019 Feb 15.
6
Preliminary results of a novel spacer technique in the management of septic revision hip arthroplasty.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2018 Nov;138(11):1617-1622. doi: 10.1007/s00402-018-3038-2. Epub 2018 Sep 18.
9
The role of acetabular cement augmentation in 2-stage revision arthroplasty for prosthetic joint infection of the hip.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Dec;144(12):5251-5260. doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05541-w. Epub 2024 Sep 11.

引用本文的文献

1
'Hybrid' spacers in two-stage total hip arthroplasty revision: surgical technique, clinical and radiographic outcomes.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2025 May 26;145(1):318. doi: 10.1007/s00402-025-05934-5.
3
Handmade spacers for two-stage exchange at the hip.
Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2023 Jun;35(3-4):146-153. doi: 10.1007/s00064-023-00811-z. Epub 2023 May 13.
4
Clinical evaluation of a new technique for custom-made spacers in septic two-stage revision of total hip arthroplasties.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Aug;143(8):5395-5403. doi: 10.1007/s00402-022-04748-z. Epub 2023 Jan 5.
5
Diagnostic Value of CRP and Serum WBC Count during Septic Two-Stage Revision of Total Hip Arthroplasties.
Antibiotics (Basel). 2022 Aug 12;11(8):1098. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11081098.
6
Cure rate of infections is not an argument for spacer in two-stage revision arthroplasty of the hip.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Apr;143(4):2199-2207. doi: 10.1007/s00402-022-04463-9. Epub 2022 May 9.
8
Antibiotics in Orthopedic Infections.
Antibiotics (Basel). 2021 Oct 25;10(11):1297. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10111297.

本文引用的文献

2
The Influence of Spacer Design on the Rate of Complications in Two-Stage Revision Hip Arthroplasty.
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Jun;34(6):1201-1206. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.02.012. Epub 2019 Feb 15.
4
Management of Periprosthetic Joint Infection.
Hip Pelvis. 2018 Sep;30(3):138-146. doi: 10.5371/hp.2018.30.3.138. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
5
The 2018 Definition of Periprosthetic Hip and Knee Infection: An Evidence-Based and Validated Criteria.
J Arthroplasty. 2018 May;33(5):1309-1314.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.02.078. Epub 2018 Feb 26.
6
Complications with cement spacers in 2-stage treatment of periprosthetic joint infection on total hip replacement.
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2018 May;104(3):333-339. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2017.11.016. Epub 2017 Dec 23.
7
[Local antibiotic therapy].
Unfallchirurg. 2017 Jul;120(7):561-572. doi: 10.1007/s00113-017-0372-8.
8
Single-stage Acetabular Revision During Two-stage THA Revision for Infection is Effective in Selected Patients.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Aug;475(8):2063-2070. doi: 10.1007/s11999-017-5334-5. Epub 2017 Mar 28.
10
Periprosthetic Infection Recurrence After 2-Stage Exchange Arthroplasty: Failure or Fate?
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Feb;32(2):526-531. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.08.002. Epub 2016 Aug 24.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验