Aschendorff Antje, Kromeier Jan, Klenzner Thomas, Laszig Roland
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Freiburg, Germany.
Ear Hear. 2007 Apr;28(2 Suppl):75S-79S. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e318031542e.
To evaluate the quality of insertion of the Nucleus Contour and the newly developed Contour Advance electrode in adult cochlear implant recipients and to compare results of speech performance tests with regard to electrode position.
A total of 43 adult patients with a history of progressive hearing loss having received a Nucleus cochlear implant, 21 of which had received a Contour electrode and 22 a Contour Advance electrode, were evaluated by rotational tomography after surgery. Electrode position was determined to be in scala tympani, scala vestibuli, or with a dislocation from one scala to the other. Speech test results were collected for Freiburg numbers, Freiburg monosyllables, and Oldenburg sentence tests 1 yr after surgery.
The Contour array presented with a high rate of scala vestibuli insertions and a high rate of dislocations from scala tympani to scala vestibuli, whereas the Contour Advance array showed a high rate of scala tympani insertions with very few dislocations and few scala vestibuli insertions. Speech tests results varied with respect to the location of the intracochlear electrode position, with insertions into the scala tympani being significantly superior to the scala vestibuli.
Results of studying the Contour array influenced the surgical procedure that improved surgical ability to perform insertions into the scala tympani by using the Contour Advance array. In addition, a comparison between Contour and Contour Advance electrode demonstrated an improved mechanical behavior of the Contour Advance electrode with a decrease of dislocation rate. The use of the Contour Advance electrode allows a more atraumatic electrode insertion, which is of interest with extending indications and the use of further advanced coding strategies. The intracochlear electrode position with regard to speech performance results demonstrated advantages of scala tympani insertions.
评估成人人工耳蜗植入受者中Nucleus Contour和新研发的Contour Advance电极的植入质量,并比较语音性能测试结果与电极位置的关系。
对43例有渐进性听力损失病史且接受过Nucleus人工耳蜗植入的成年患者进行评估,其中21例接受了Contour电极,22例接受了Contour Advance电极,术后通过螺旋CT进行检查。确定电极位置是在鼓阶、前庭阶,还是从一个阶错位到另一个阶。术后1年收集弗赖堡数字测试、弗赖堡单音节测试和奥尔登堡句子测试的语音测试结果。
Contour阵列在前庭阶的植入率较高,且从鼓阶向前庭阶的错位率较高,而Contour Advance阵列在鼓阶的植入率较高,错位极少,在前庭阶的植入较少。语音测试结果因耳蜗内电极位置而异,鼓阶植入明显优于前庭阶植入。
对Contour阵列的研究结果影响了手术操作,通过使用Contour Advance阵列提高了鼓阶植入的手术能力。此外,Contour电极与Contour Advance电极的比较表明,Contour Advance电极的机械性能有所改善,错位率降低。使用Contour Advance电极可实现更无创的电极植入,这对于扩大适应症和使用更先进的编码策略具有重要意义。耳蜗内电极位置与语音性能结果的关系表明鼓阶植入具有优势。