Rao Jaya K, Anderson Lynda A, Inui Thomas S, Frankel Richard M
Healthy Aging Program, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Med Care. 2007 Apr;45(4):340-9. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000254516.04961.d5.
We sought to synthesize the findings of studies examining interventions to enhance the communication behaviors of physicians and patients during outpatient encounters.
We conducted searches of 6 databases between 1966 and 2005 to identify studies for a systematic review and synthesis of the literature. Eligible studies tested a communication intervention; were randomized controlled trials (RCTs); objectively assessed verbal communication behaviors as the primary outcome; and were published in English. Interventions were characterized by type (eg, information, modeling, feedback, practice), delivery strategy, and overall intensity. We abstracted information on the effects of the interventions on communication outcomes (eg, interpersonal and information exchanging behaviors). We examined the effectiveness of the interventions in improving the communication behaviors of physicians and patients.
Thirty-six studies were reviewed: 18 involved physicians; 15 patients; and 3 both. Of the physician interventions, 76% included 3 or 4 types, often in the form of practice and feedback sessions. Among the patient interventions, 33% involved 1 type, and nearly all were delivered in the waiting room. Intervention physicians were more likely than controls to receive higher ratings of their overall communication style and to exhibit specific patient-centered communication behaviors. Intervention patients obtained more information from physicians and exhibited greater involvement during the visit than controls.
The interventions were associated with improved physician and patient communication behaviors. The challenge for future research is to design effective patient and physician interventions that can be integrated into practice.
我们试图综合各项研究的结果,这些研究探讨了在门诊就诊期间增强医生与患者沟通行为的干预措施。
我们在1966年至2005年期间检索了6个数据库,以确定用于系统评价和文献综合分析的研究。符合条件的研究需测试一种沟通干预措施;为随机对照试验(RCT);将言语沟通行为作为主要结局进行客观评估;且以英文发表。干预措施按类型(如信息、示范、反馈、练习)、实施策略和总体强度进行分类。我们提取了关于干预措施对沟通结局(如人际和信息交换行为)影响的信息。我们考察了干预措施在改善医生和患者沟通行为方面的有效性。
共审查了36项研究:18项涉及医生;15项涉及患者;3项两者都涉及。在医生干预措施中,76%包含3种或4种类型,通常采用练习和反馈环节的形式。在患者干预措施中,33%涉及1种类型,且几乎所有都是在候诊室实施的。与对照组相比,接受干预的医生更有可能在整体沟通风格上获得更高评分,并表现出以患者为中心的特定沟通行为。与对照组相比,接受干预的患者从医生那里获得了更多信息,并且在就诊期间表现出更高的参与度。
这些干预措施与改善医生和患者的沟通行为相关。未来研究面临的挑战是设计出能够融入临床实践的有效的患者和医生干预措施。