Kellerhoff Rolf K, Fischer Jens
Department of Removable Prosthodontics, School of Dental Medicine, University of Berne, Berne, Switzerland.
J Prosthet Dent. 2007 Apr;97(4):209-15. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.02.007.
AuTi alloys with 1.6% to 1.7% (wt%) Ti provide sufficient bond strength to veneering ceramics, but the strength of entire metal-ceramic restorations fabricated from these alloys is not known. However, this information is important to assess the clinical performance of such materials.
This in vitro study evaluated the fracture strength and thermal shock resistance of metal-ceramic crowns with AuTi frameworks produced by milling or casting.
Frameworks of the alloy Au-1.7Ti-0.1Ir (wt%) (Esteticor Vision) were produced by milling or casting (test groups). A high-gold alloy (Esteticor Special) was used as the control. The frameworks were veneered with ceramic (VMK 95). Specimens (n=7) were loaded until fracture. Loads at failure (N) were recorded and the mean values statistically evaluated using 1-way analysis of variance and a post hoc Dunnett test (alpha=.05). To assess the crazing resistance of the veneering ceramic, 6 additional crowns of each group were subjected to a thermal shock test. Fractured surfaces were documented by scanning electron microscopy. Coefficients of thermal expansion of the materials used were measured (n=2) to assess the thermal compatibility between alloys and ceramic.
The mean fracture strength of the crowns with machined AuTi frameworks (1294 +/- 236 N) was significantly lower (P=.012) than that of the cast AuTi frameworks (1680 +/- 150 N), but statistically not different than the high-gold alloy (1449 +/- 159 N). Bonding failure to the AuTi alloy predominantly occurred at the alloy-oxide interface. For the high-gold alloy, more ceramic residues were observed. In the thermal shock test, crowns with milled AuTi frameworks showed significantly higher thermal shock resistance compared to the other groups. The coefficients of thermal expansion (Esteticor Vision cast: 14.5 microm/m.K; Esteticor Vision milled: 14.3 microm/m.K; Esteticor Special cast: 13.7 microm/m.K) did not correlate with the results of the thermal shock test.
The in vitro fracture strength of crowns with milled AuTi frameworks is lower than that obtained with cast AuTi frameworks, but comparable to those crowns produced with a high-gold alloy.
含1.6%至1.7%(重量百分比)钛的金钛合金能为饰面陶瓷提供足够的粘结强度,但由这些合金制成的整个金属陶瓷修复体的强度尚不清楚。然而,这些信息对于评估此类材料的临床性能很重要。
本体外研究评估了通过铣削或铸造生产的带有金钛框架的金属陶瓷冠的断裂强度和抗热震性。
采用铣削或铸造(试验组)的方式制作Au-1.7Ti-0.1Ir(重量百分比)合金(Esteticor Vision)的框架。使用一种高金合金(Esteticor Special)作为对照。框架用陶瓷(VMK 95)进行饰面处理。对样本(n = 7)施加负荷直至断裂。记录失效时的负荷(牛顿),并使用单向方差分析和事后Dunnett检验(α = 0.05)对平均值进行统计学评估。为评估饰面陶瓷的抗裂纹性,每组额外制作6个冠进行热震试验。通过扫描电子显微镜记录断裂表面。测量所用材料的热膨胀系数(n = 2)以评估合金与陶瓷之间的热相容性。
铣削金钛框架的冠的平均断裂强度(1294 ± 236牛顿)显著低于铸造金钛框架的冠(1680 ± 150牛顿)(P = 0.012),但在统计学上与高金合金(1449 ± 159牛顿)无差异。与金钛合金的粘结失效主要发生在合金 - 氧化物界面。对于高金合金,观察到更多的陶瓷残留物。在热震试验中,铣削金钛框架的冠与其他组相比显示出显著更高的抗热震性。热膨胀系数(Esteticor Vision铸造:14.5微米/米·开尔文;Esteticor Vision铣削:14.3微米/米·开尔文;Esteticor Special铸造:13.7微米/米·开尔文)与热震试验结果无关。
铣削金钛框架的冠的体外断裂强度低于铸造金钛框架的冠,但与高金合金制作的冠相当。