• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

刺激属性比视角更重要:一项关于动作短语心理意象和默读的功能磁共振成像研究。

Stimulus properties matter more than perspective: an fMRI study of mental imagery and silent reading of action phrases.

作者信息

Tomasino Barbara, Werner Cornelius J, Weiss Peter H, Fink Gereon R

机构信息

Institute of Neuroscience and Biophysics, Department of Medicine, Research Centre Juelich, Juelich, Germany.

出版信息

Neuroimage. 2007;36 Suppl 2:T128-41. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.03.035. Epub 2007 Mar 31.

DOI:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.03.035
PMID:17499160
Abstract

UNLABELLED

The role of the primary motor cortex (M1) in tasks involving action words remains controversial. Therefore, we investigated whether the previously reported involvement of M1 in processing of action words results from the semantic representation of action words per se, or if M1 activation may actually depend on whether or not subjects (explicitly or automatically) adopt a strategy of simulating the movements. Subjects silently read short phrases describing a situation which either involved a motor scene or not (STIMULUS: motor, non-motor phrases) and performed a secondary task: either they were explicitly asked to imagine the situation or they performed letter detection preventing them from using a simulation strategy (TASK: imagery vs. letter detection). In addition, phrases were presented both in 1st and 3rd person singular (

PERSPECTIVE

1st vs. 3rd person). This allowed us to investigate the influence of the secondary tasks (letter detection versus explicit motor imagery) on the neural activity in M1 during the processing of motor and non-motor phrases. We found differential left M1 activity in the task by stimulus interaction with enhanced M1 activation for imagery in the presence of motor phrases (vs. non-motor phrases) compared to letter detection of motor vs. non-motor phrases. This M1-activity was not differentially modulated by perspective. Therefore, M1 activation previously found in experiments of silent reading of action words may have resulted from the subjects' strategy to mentally simulate the movements during the processing of action words.

摘要

未标注

初级运动皮层(M1)在涉及动作词的任务中的作用仍存在争议。因此,我们研究了先前报道的M1参与动作词加工是源于动作词本身的语义表征,还是M1激活实际上可能取决于受试者(明确地或自动地)是否采用模拟动作的策略。受试者默读描述涉及或不涉及运动场景的情境的短语句(刺激:运动、非运动短语),并执行一项次要任务:要么明确要求他们想象情境,要么执行字母检测任务以阻止他们使用模拟策略(任务:想象与字母检测)。此外,短语以第一人称单数和第三人称单数呈现(视角:第一人称与第三人称)。这使我们能够研究次要任务(字母检测与明确的运动想象)对M1在运动和非运动短语加工过程中的神经活动的影响。我们发现,在任务与刺激的交互作用中,左侧M1活动存在差异,与字母检测相比,在存在运动短语(与非运动短语相比)时,想象会增强M1激活。这种M1活动不受视角的差异调节。因此,先前在默读动作词实验中发现的M1激活可能是由于受试者在动作词加工过程中进行心理模拟动作的策略所致。

相似文献

1
Stimulus properties matter more than perspective: an fMRI study of mental imagery and silent reading of action phrases.刺激属性比视角更重要:一项关于动作短语心理意象和默读的功能磁共振成像研究。
Neuroimage. 2007;36 Suppl 2:T128-41. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.03.035. Epub 2007 Mar 31.
2
Action verbs and the primary motor cortex: a comparative TMS study of silent reading, frequency judgments, and motor imagery.动作动词与初级运动皮层:默读、频率判断和运动想象的比较性经颅磁刺激研究
Neuropsychologia. 2008;46(7):1915-26. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.01.015. Epub 2008 Feb 2.
3
How do conceptual representations interact with processing demands: An fMRI study on action- and abstract-related words.概念表征如何与加工需求相互作用:一项关于动作相关词和抽象相关词的功能磁共振成像研究
Brain Res. 2014 Dec 3;1591:38-52. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2014.10.008. Epub 2014 Oct 14.
4
Neural topography and content of movement representations.神经拓扑结构与运动表征的内容
J Cogn Neurosci. 2005 Jan;17(1):97-112. doi: 10.1162/0898929052880039.
5
On-line changing of thinking about words: the effect of cognitive context on neural responses to verb reading.在线词语思维转换:认知语境对动词阅读神经反应的影响。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2012 Dec;24(12):2348-62. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00291. Epub 2012 Sep 12.
6
To move or not to move: imperatives modulate action-related verb processing in the motor system.动还是不动:祈使句调节运动系统中的与动作相关的动词加工。
Neuroscience. 2010 Aug 11;169(1):246-58. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2010.04.039. Epub 2010 Apr 24.
7
Investigation of fMRI neurofeedback of differential primary motor cortex activity using kinesthetic motor imagery.使用运动觉想象对初级运动皮层活动的 fMRI 神经反馈进行研究。
Neuroimage. 2012 May 15;61(1):21-31. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.02.053. Epub 2012 Mar 3.
8
Hand movement distribution in the motor cortex: the influence of a concurrent task and motor imagery.运动皮层中的手部运动分布:并发任务和运动想象的影响。
Neuroimage. 2004 Aug;22(4):1480-91. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.02.040.
9
Neural impact of the semantic content of visual mental images and visual percepts.视觉心理意象和视觉感知的语义内容的神经影响。
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2005 Aug;24(3):423-35. doi: 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.02.018. Epub 2005 Apr 8.
10
Neural dissociations between action verb understanding and motor imagery.动作动词理解和运动意象的神经分离。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2010 Oct;22(10):2387-400. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21386.

引用本文的文献

1
How Action Shapes Temporal Judgments: A Study in Brain Damaged Patients Through Immersive Virtual Reality.行动如何塑造时间判断:通过沉浸式虚拟现实对脑损伤患者的研究
J Clin Med. 2025 Jul 8;14(14):4825. doi: 10.3390/jcm14144825.
2
Brain Functional Connectivity During First- and Third-Person Visual Imagery.第一人称和第三人称视觉想象过程中的脑功能连接
Vision (Basel). 2025 Apr 6;9(2):30. doi: 10.3390/vision9020030.
3
Differences in perceptual representations in multilinguals' first, second, and third language.多语言者的第一、第二和第三语言中感知表征的差异。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2024 Jul 1;18:1408411. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1408411. eCollection 2024.
4
Distinct brain dynamics and networks for processing short and long auditory time intervals.处理短和长听觉时间间隔的大脑动力学和网络的差异。
Sci Rep. 2023 Dec 12;13(1):22018. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-49562-8.
5
Modal and amodal cognition: an overarching principle in various domains of psychology.模态与非模态认知:心理学各领域的一个统领性原则。
Psychol Res. 2024 Mar;88(2):307-337. doi: 10.1007/s00426-023-01878-w. Epub 2023 Oct 17.
6
Brain Signatures of Embodied Semantics and Language: A Consensus Paper.具身语义与语言的脑特征:一篇共识论文。
J Cogn. 2023 Oct 10;6(1):61. doi: 10.5334/joc.237. eCollection 2023.
7
The interaction between motor simulation and spatial perspective-taking in action language: a cross-cultural study.动作语言中运动模拟与空间视角-taking 的相互作用:一项跨文化研究。
Mem Cognit. 2023 Nov;51(8):1870-1880. doi: 10.3758/s13421-023-01427-1. Epub 2023 May 19.
8
Motor imagery training to improve language processing: What are the arguments?运动想象训练以改善语言处理:有哪些论据?
Front Hum Neurosci. 2023 Feb 1;17:982849. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2023.982849. eCollection 2023.
9
Neural correlates of embodied action language processing: a systematic review and meta-analytic study.具身动作语言处理的神经关联:系统综述和荟萃分析研究。
Brain Imaging Behav. 2022 Oct;16(5):2353-2374. doi: 10.1007/s11682-022-00680-3. Epub 2022 Jun 27.
10
Multisensory mental representation in covid-19 patients and the possibility of long-lasting gustatory and olfactory dysfunction in the CNS.新冠患者的多感官精神表象和 CNS 中味觉与嗅觉持久性功能障碍的可能性。
Sci Rep. 2022 May 5;12(1):7340. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-11119-6.