Frohm A, Halvorsen K, Thorstensson A
Elite Sports Centre, Swedish Sports Confederation, Bosön, Sweden.
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2007 Jul;22(6):704-11. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2006.12.006. Epub 2007 May 11.
Differences in mechanical loading of the patellar tendon have been suggested as a reason for varying effects in rehabilitation of patellar tendinopathy using different eccentric squat exercises and devices. The aim was to characterize the magnitude and pattern of mechanical load at the knee and on the patellar tendon during four types of eccentric squat.
Subjects performed squats with a submaximal free weight and with maximal effort in a device for eccentric overloading (Bromsman), on a decline board and horizontal surface. Kinematics was recorded with a motion-capture system, reaction forces with force plates, and electromyography from three leg muscles with surface electrodes. Inverse dynamics was used to calculate knee joint kinetics.
Eccentric work, mean and peak patellar tendon force, and angle at peak force were greater (25-30%) for squats on decline board compared to horizontal surface with free weight, but not in Bromsman. Higher knee load forces (60-80%), but not work, were observed with Bromsman than free weight. Angular excursions at the knee and ankle were larger with decline board, particularly with free weight, and smaller in Bromsman than with free weight. Mean electromyography was greater on a decline board for gastrocnemius (13%) and vastus medialis (6%) with free weight, but in Bromsman only for gastrocnemius (7%).
The results demonstrated clear differences in the biomechanical loading on the knee during different squat exercises. Quantification of such differences provides information that could be used to explain differences in rehabilitation effects as well as in designing more optimal rehabilitation exercises for patellar tendinopathy.
有人提出,髌腱机械负荷的差异是使用不同的离心蹲起练习和器械治疗髌腱病时康复效果各异的原因。本研究旨在描述四种类型的离心蹲起过程中膝关节和髌腱的机械负荷大小及模式。
受试者在使用次最大自由重量、在离心过载器械(布罗姆斯曼器械)上竭尽全力、在下降板和水平面上进行蹲起。使用运动捕捉系统记录运动学数据,使用测力板记录反作用力,使用表面电极记录三块腿部肌肉的肌电图。采用逆动力学方法计算膝关节动力学。
与在水平面上使用自由重量蹲起相比,在下降板上蹲起时的离心功、髌腱平均力和峰值力以及峰值力时的角度更大(25%-30%),但在布罗姆斯曼器械上并非如此。与自由重量相比,使用布罗姆斯曼器械时观察到更高的膝关节负荷力(60%-80%),但功没有差异。下降板上膝关节和踝关节的角位移更大,尤其是使用自由重量时,而在布罗姆斯曼器械上比使用自由重量时更小。在下降板上,使用自由重量时腓肠肌(13%)和股内侧肌(6%)的平均肌电图更大,但在布罗姆斯曼器械上仅腓肠肌(7%)的平均肌电图更大。
结果表明不同蹲起练习过程中膝关节的生物力学负荷存在明显差异。对这些差异进行量化可提供信息,用于解释康复效果的差异以及为髌腱病设计更优化的康复练习。