Tokuhashi Y, Satoh K, Funami S
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1991 Nov;16(11):1321-8. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199111000-00013.
A quantitative evaluation of sensory disturbance of the foot was attempted in 94 cases of lumbosacral radiculopathy using the biothesiometer, the Semmes-Weinstein esthesiometer, light touch, tuning fork, and dermatomal somatosensory evoked potentials. Dermatomal somatosensory evoked potentials was the most sensitive of these tests, and reflected the duration of the lumbosacral radiculopathy better than the biothesiometer and the Semmes-Weinstein esthesiometer. The biothesiometer and Semmes-Weinstein esthesiometer reflected the clinical severity of sensory dysfunctions, the extent of numbness, and the immediate change in sensory function better than the dermatomal somatosensory evoked potentials. It is important to understand the characteristics of each test and to choose informative tests for clinical use. Grades of sensory disturbance in patients with lumbosacral radiculopathy were classified into three categories in combination with the findings of dermatomal somatosensory evoked potentials and the values recorded with the biothesiometer and Semmes-Weinstein esthesiometer.
使用生物感觉测量仪、Semmes-Weinstein触觉测量仪、轻触觉、音叉以及皮节体感诱发电位,对94例腰骶神经根病患者足部的感觉障碍进行了定量评估。皮节体感诱发电位是这些检查中最敏感的,并且比生物感觉测量仪和Semmes-Weinstein触觉测量仪能更好地反映腰骶神经根病的病程。生物感觉测量仪和Semmes-Weinstein触觉测量仪比皮节体感诱发电位能更好地反映感觉功能障碍的临床严重程度、麻木范围以及感觉功能的即时变化。了解每项检查的特点并选择对临床有用的信息性检查很重要。结合皮节体感诱发电位的结果以及生物感觉测量仪和Semmes-Weinstein触觉测量仪记录的值,将腰骶神经根病患者的感觉障碍等级分为三类。