Dempsey Kate E, Riggio Marcello P, Lennon Alan, Hannah Victoria E, Ramage Gordon, Allan David, Bagg Jeremy
Infection and Immunity Research Group, Level 9, Glasgow Dental Hospital & School, 378 Sauchiehall Street, Glasgow G2 3JZ, UK.
Arthritis Res Ther. 2007;9(3):R46. doi: 10.1186/ar2201.
It has been postulated that bacteria attached to the surface of prosthetic hip joints can cause localised inflammation, resulting in failure of the replacement joint. However, diagnosis of infection is difficult with traditional microbiological culture methods, and evidence exists that highly fastidious or non-cultivable organisms have a role in implant infections. The purpose of this study was to use culture and culture-independent methods to detect the bacteria present on the surface of prosthetic hip joints removed during revision arthroplasties. Ten consecutive revisions were performed by two surgeons, which were all clinically and radiologically loose. Five of the hip replacement revision surgeries were performed because of clinical infections and five because of aseptic loosening. Preoperative and perioperative specimens were obtained from each patient and subjected to routine microbiological culture. The prostheses removed from each patient were subjected to mild ultrasonication to dislodge adherent bacteria, followed by aerobic and anaerobic microbiological culture. Bacterial DNA was extracted from each sonicate and the 16S rRNA gene was amplified with the universal primer pair 27f/1387r. All 10 specimens were positive for the presence of bacteria by both culture and PCR. PCR products were then cloned, organised into groups by RFLP analysis and one clone from each group was sequenced. Bacteria were identified by comparison of the 16S rRNA gene sequences obtained with those deposited in public access sequence databases. A total of 512 clones were analysed by RFLP analysis, of which 118 were sequenced. Culture methods identified species from the genera Leifsonia (54.3%), Staphylococcus (21.7%), Proteus (8.7%), Brevundimonas (6.5%), Salibacillus (4.3%), Methylobacterium (2.2%) and Zimmermannella (2.2%). Molecular detection methods identified a more diverse microflora. The predominant genus detected was Lysobacter, representing 312 (60.9%) of 512 clones analysed. In all, 28 phylotypes were identified: Lysobacter enzymogenes was the most abundant phylotype (31.4%), followed by Lysobacter sp. C3 (28.3%), gamma proteobacterium N4-7 (6.6%), Methylobacterium SM4 (4.7%) and Staphylococcus epidermidis (4.7%); 36 clones (7.0%) represented uncultivable phylotypes. We conclude that a diverse range of bacterial species are found within biofilms on the surface of clinically infected and non-infected prosthetic hip joints removed during revision arthroplasties.
据推测,附着在人工髋关节表面的细菌可引起局部炎症,导致置换关节失效。然而,传统的微生物培养方法难以诊断感染,并且有证据表明,苛求性很强或不可培养的微生物在植入物感染中起作用。本研究的目的是使用培养和非培养方法来检测在翻修关节成形术中移除的人工髋关节表面存在的细菌。两位外科医生连续进行了10例翻修手术,这些手术在临床和放射学上均显示松动。其中5例髋关节置换翻修手术是由于临床感染进行的,另外5例是由于无菌性松动进行的。从每位患者获取术前和围手术期标本,并进行常规微生物培养。将从每位患者移除的假体进行轻度超声处理,以去除附着的细菌,然后进行需氧和厌氧微生物培养。从每个超声处理物中提取细菌DNA,并用通用引物对27f/1387r扩增16S rRNA基因。通过培养和PCR检测,所有10个标本均检测到细菌存在。然后将PCR产物克隆,通过RFLP分析进行分组,并对每组中的一个克隆进行测序。通过将获得的16S rRNA基因序列与保存在公共访问序列数据库中的序列进行比较来鉴定细菌。通过RFLP分析共分析了512个克隆,其中118个进行了测序。培养方法鉴定出的菌种来自Leifsonia属(54.3%)、葡萄球菌属(21.7%)、变形杆菌属(8.7%)、短波单胞菌属(6.5%)、盐芽孢杆菌属(4.3%)、甲基杆菌属(2.2%)和齐默尔曼菌属(2.2%)。分子检测方法鉴定出了更多样化的微生物群落。检测到的主要属是溶杆菌属,在分析的512个克隆中占312个(60.9%)。总共鉴定出28个系统发育型:产酶溶杆菌是最丰富的系统发育型(31.4%),其次是溶杆菌属C3菌株(28.3%)、γ-变形菌N4-7(6.6%)、甲基杆菌SM4(4.7%)和表皮葡萄球菌(4.7%);36个克隆(7.0%)代表不可培养的系统发育型。我们得出结论,在翻修关节成形术中移除的临床感染和未感染的人工髋关节表面的生物膜中发现了多种细菌。