Wang Ji-Guang, Li Yan, Franklin Stanley S, Safar Michel
Centre for Epidemiological Studies and Clinical Trials, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Hypertension. 2007 Jul;50(1):181-8. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.107.089763. Epub 2007 May 14.
In the present quantitative overview of outcome trials, we investigated the efficacy of amlodipine or angiotensin receptor blockers in the prevention of stroke and myocardial infarction in patients with hypertension, coronary artery disease, or diabetic nephropathy. The analysis included 12 trials of 94 338 patients. The analysis of trials involving an amlodipine group showed that amlodipine provided more protection against stroke and myocardial infarction than other antihypertensive drugs, including angiotensin receptor blockers (-19%, P<0.0001 and -7%, P=0.03) and placebo (-37%, P=0.06 and -29%, P=0.04). The analysis of trials involving an angiotensin receptor blocker group showed contrasting results between trials versus amlodipine and trials versus other antihypertensive drugs for stroke (+19% versus -25%; P<0.0001) and myocardial infarction (+21% versus +1%; P=0.03). The results of 3 trials comparing an angiotensin receptor blocker with placebo were neutral (P> or =0.14). The within-trial between-group difference in achieved systolic pressure ranged from -1.1 to +4.7 mm Hg for trials involving an amlodipine group and from -2.8 to +4.0 mm Hg for trials involving an angiotensin receptor blocker group. The metaregression analysis correlating odds ratios with blood pressure differences showed a negative relationship (regression coefficients: -3% to -8%), which reached statistical significance (regression coefficient: -6%; P=0.01) for stroke in trials involving an amlodipine group. In conclusion, blood pressure differences largely accounted for cardiovascular outcome.
在本次关于结局试验的定量综述中,我们研究了氨氯地平或血管紧张素受体阻滞剂在预防高血压、冠状动脉疾病或糖尿病肾病患者发生中风和心肌梗死方面的疗效。该分析纳入了12项试验,涉及94338名患者。对涉及氨氯地平组的试验分析表明,与其他抗高血压药物(包括血管紧张素受体阻滞剂,降低19%,P<0.0001;降低7%,P=0.03)及安慰剂(降低37%,P=0.06;降低29%,P=0.04)相比,氨氯地平对中风和心肌梗死的预防作用更强。对涉及血管紧张素受体阻滞剂组的试验分析显示,在与氨氯地平对比的试验及与其他抗高血压药物对比的试验中,中风(分别为增加19%与降低25%;P<0.0001)和心肌梗死(分别为增加21%与增加1%;P=0.03)的结果存在差异。3项比较血管紧张素受体阻滞剂与安慰剂的试验结果呈中性(P≥0.14)。在涉及氨氯地平组的试验中,组间达到的收缩压差异在-1.1至+4.7 mmHg之间;在涉及血管紧张素受体阻滞剂组的试验中,该差异在-2.8至+4.0 mmHg之间。将比值比与血压差异相关联的Meta回归分析显示存在负相关关系(回归系数:-3%至-8%),在涉及氨氯地平组的试验中,中风的负相关关系达到统计学显著性(回归系数:-6%;P=0.01)。总之,血压差异在很大程度上决定了心血管结局。