Suppr超能文献

采用不同免疫测定法检测乙型肝炎病毒E基因型表面抗原及前S/S基因变异的诊断影响

Hepatitis B virus genotype E surface antigen detection with different immunoassays and diagnostic impact of mutations in the preS/S gene.

作者信息

Olinger Christophe M, Weber Bernard, Otegbayo Jesse A, Ammerlaan Wim, van der Taelem-Brulé Natascha, Muller Claude P

机构信息

Institute of Immunology, National Public Health Laboratory, 20a, rue Auguste Lumière, 1950, Luxembourg, Luxembourg.

出版信息

Med Microbiol Immunol. 2007 Dec;196(4):247-52. doi: 10.1007/s00430-007-0050-5. Epub 2007 May 15.

Abstract

The major neutralizing epitope, the "a" determinant of the hepatitis B virus (HBV) genotype E surface antigen (HBsAg) is most divergent from that of genotype A, which is used for preparing monoclonal antibodies used in commercially available HBV reagents. To evaluate the performance of the latest generation of HBsAg detection assays with respect to genotype E HBsAg. Three commercial assays were evaluated using sera from 200 Nigerian patients compared to the preS/S sequence of DNA positive samples. Out of 200 samples, 61 and 103 gave concordant positive and negative results between the three HBsAg assays. Of 36 samples with discordant results, 35 were confirmed negative by neutralisation. One of the three assays showed significantly high rate of false positives (29 of 35). DNA positive samples with no detectable HBsAg or reduced HBsAg detection signals (<75% of mean signal obtained with HBsAg positive samples) revealed several mutations (V14A, F46S, N48T, L49R, I49T, D51G, A53V, P54L, Q82P, F83C, L127P, A184V, T189I, S204N, V224A), mostly outside the a-determinant. Several of these mutations are found as wild type nucleotides normally in genotype A and only exceptionally in genotype E. All three assays showed comparable sensitivities for genotype E HBsAg detection (98.4-100%) but differed considerably in specificity (84-99%). Failure to detect HBsAg antigen and differences in signal intensity were mainly associated with mutations in the preS/S gene outside the "a" determinant.

摘要

乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)E基因型表面抗原(HBsAg)的主要中和表位,即“a”决定簇,与A基因型的差异最大,而A基因型用于制备市售HBV试剂中使用的单克隆抗体。为了评估最新一代HBsAg检测方法对E基因型HBsAg的检测性能。使用200名尼日利亚患者的血清对三种商业检测方法进行了评估,并与DNA阳性样本的前S/S序列进行了比较。在200个样本中,61个和103个在三种HBsAg检测方法之间给出了一致的阳性和阴性结果。在36个结果不一致的样本中,35个通过中和确认阴性。三种检测方法中的一种显示出显著高的假阳性率(35个中的29个)。未检测到HBsAg或HBsAg检测信号降低(<HBsAg阳性样本获得的平均信号的75%)的DNA阳性样本显示出几种突变(V14A、F46S、N48T、L49R、I49T、D51G、A53V、P54L、Q82P、F83C、L127P、A184V、T189I、S204N、V224A),大多在a决定簇之外。这些突变中的几种通常在A基因型中作为野生型核苷酸出现,而在E基因型中仅偶尔出现。所有三种检测方法对E基因型HBsAg检测的灵敏度相当(98.4-100%),但特异性差异很大(84-99%)。未能检测到HBsAg抗原以及信号强度的差异主要与“a”决定簇之外的前S/S基因中的突变有关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验