Hill K, Jenkins S C, Philippe D L, Shepherd K L, Hillman D R, Eastwood P R
Department of Pulmonary Physiology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Hospital Avenue, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia 6009.
Eur Respir J. 2007 Sep;30(3):479-86. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00095406. Epub 2007 May 15.
The aim of the present study was to determine the relative value of incremental and constant load tests in detecting changes in inspiratory muscle endurance following high-intensity inspiratory muscle training (H-IMT) in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. In total, 16 subjects (11 males; forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV(1)) 37.4+/-12.5%) underwent H-IMT. In addition, 17 subjects (11 males; FEV(1) 36.5+/-11.5%) underwent sham inspiratory muscle training (S-IMT). Training took place three times a week for 8 weeks. Baseline and post-training measurements were obtained of maximum threshold pressure sustained during an incremental load test (P(th,max)) and time breathing against a constant load (t(lim)). Breathing pattern was unconstrained. H-IMT increased P(th,max) and t(lim) relative to baseline and to any change seen following S-IMT. The effect size for P(th,max) was greater than for t(lim). Post-training tests were accompanied by changes in breathing pattern, including decreased duty cycle, which may have served to decrease inspiratory work and thereby contribute to the increase in P(th,max) and t(lim) in both groups. When assessing inspiratory muscle function in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease via tests in which the pattern of breathing is unconstrained, the current authors recommend incremental load tests be used in preference to constant load tests. However, to attribute changes in these tests to improvements in inspiratory muscle endurance, breathing pattern should be controlled.
本研究的目的是确定递增负荷试验和恒定负荷试验在检测慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者进行高强度吸气肌训练(H-IMT)后吸气肌耐力变化方面的相对价值。共有16名受试者(11名男性;一秒用力呼气容积(FEV(1))为37.4±12.5%)接受了H-IMT。此外,17名受试者(11名男性;FEV(1)为36.5±11.5%)接受了假吸气肌训练(S-IMT)。训练每周进行3次,共8周。在递增负荷试验期间测量的最大阈值压力(P(th,max))和对抗恒定负荷呼吸的时间(t(lim))在基线和训练后进行了测量。呼吸模式不受限制。与基线以及S-IMT后出现的任何变化相比,H-IMT使P(th,max)和t(lim)增加。P(th,max)的效应大小大于t(lim)。训练后的测试伴随着呼吸模式的变化,包括占空比降低,这可能有助于减少吸气功,从而导致两组的P(th,max)和t(lim)增加。当通过呼吸模式不受限制的测试评估慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的吸气肌功能时,本文作者建议优先使用递增负荷试验而非恒定负荷试验。然而,为了将这些测试中的变化归因于吸气肌耐力的改善,应控制呼吸模式。