Suppr超能文献

递增斜坡负荷协议评估健康个体的吸气肌耐力:与递增台阶负荷协议的比较。

Incremental Ramp Load Protocol to Assess Inspiratory Muscle Endurance in Healthy Individuals: Comparison with Incremental Step Loading Protocol.

机构信息

Grupo de Pesquisa em Avaliação e Reabilitação Cardiorrespiratória (GECARE)/Faculdade de Fisioterapia, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Educação Física/Escola de Educação Física e Desportos, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Grupo de Pesquisa em Avaliação e Reabilitação Cardiorrespiratória (GECARE)/Faculdade de Fisioterapia/ Programa de Pós-Graduação em Medicina-Cardiologia/Instituto do Coração Edson Saad, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

出版信息

Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2024 Apr 3;39(2):e20230231. doi: 10.21470/1678-9741-2023-0231.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Protocols for obtaíníng the maxímum threshold pressure have been applied wíth límited precision to evaluate ínspiratory muscle endurance. In thís sense, new protocols are needed to allow more relíable measurements. The purpose of the present study was to compare a new incremental ramp load protocol for the evaluation of ínspíratory muscle endurance wíth the most used protocol in healthy indíviduals.

METHODS

This was a prospective cross-sectional study carried out ín a síngle center. Nínety-two healthy indíviduals (43 men [22 ± 3 years] and 49 women [22 ± 3 years]) were randomly allocated to perform: (i) íncremental ramp load protocol and (íí) íncremental step loadíng protocol. The sustained pressure threshold (or maximum threshold pressure), maximum threshold pressure/dynamic strength índex ratío, time untíl task faílure, as well as dífference between the mean heart rate of the last five mínutes of baselíne and the peak heart rate of the last 30 seconds of each protocol were measured.

RESULTS

Incremental ramp load protocol wíth small íncreases in the load and starting from mínímum values of strength index was able to evaluate the inspiratory muscle endurance through the maxímum threshold pressure of healthy indívíduals.

CONCLUSION

The present study suggests that the íncremental ramp load protocol is able to measure maximum threshold pressure in a more thorough way, wíth less progression and greater accuracy in the load stratification compared to the límited incremental step loading protocol and with a safe and expected cardiovascular response in healthy individuals.

摘要

简介

为了评估吸气肌耐力,已经应用了获得最大阈压的方案,但精度有限。在这方面,需要新的方案来进行更可靠的测量。本研究的目的是比较一种新的递增斜坡负荷方案与最常用于健康个体的方案,以评估吸气肌耐力。

方法

这是一项在单一中心进行的前瞻性横断面研究。92 名健康个体(43 名男性[22 ± 3 岁]和 49 名女性[22 ± 3 岁])被随机分配进行:(i)递增斜坡负荷方案和(ii)递增台阶负荷方案。测量持续压力阈值(或最大阈压)、最大阈压/动态强度指数比值、任务失败时间,以及基线最后 5 分钟平均心率与每个方案最后 30 秒峰值心率之间的差异。

结果

递增斜坡负荷方案以小幅度增加负荷并从强度指数的最小值开始,能够评估健康个体的吸气肌耐力。

结论

本研究表明,与有限的递增台阶负荷方案相比,递增斜坡负荷方案能够更全面地测量最大阈压,负荷分层的进展更小,准确性更高,并且在健康个体中具有安全且可预期的心血管反应。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6761/10987037/e6011b2ccd64/bjcvs-39-02-e20230231-g01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验