Soubrier Stéphane, Saulnier Fabienne, Hubert Hervé, Delour Pierre, Lenci Hélène, Onimus Thierry, Nseir Saad, Durocher Alain
Service de Réanimation Médicale, Hôpital Calmette, CHRU, boulevard du Pr Leclercq, 59037, Lille cedex, France.
EA 3614, Lille II University, 59000, Lille, France.
Intensive Care Med. 2007 Jul;33(7):1117-1124. doi: 10.1007/s00134-007-0644-9. Epub 2007 May 17.
To investigate whether the respiratory changes in arterial pulse (DeltaPP) and in systolic pressure (DeltaSP) could predict fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing (SB) patients. Because changes in intrathoracic pressure during spontaneous breathing (SB) might be insufficient to modify loading conditions of the ventricles, performances of indicators were also assessed during a forced respiratory maneuver.
Prospective interventional study.
A 34-bed university hospital medico-surgical ICU.
Thirty-two SB patients with clinical signs of hemodynamic instability.
A 500-ml volume expansion (VE).
Cardiac index, assessed using transthoracic echocardiography, increased by at least 15% after VE in 19 patients (responders). At baseline, only dynamic indicators were higher in responders than in nonresponders (13+/-5% vs. 7+/-3%, p=0.003 for DeltaPP and 10+/-4% vs. 6+/-2%, p=0.002 for DeltaSP). Moreover, they significantly decreased after VE (11+/-5% to 6+/-4%, p<0.001 for DeltaPP and 8+/-4% to 6+/-3%, p<0.001 for DeltaSP). DeltaPP and DeltaSP areas under the ROC curve were high (0.81+/-0.08 and 0.82+/-0.08; p=0.888, respectively). A DeltaPP>or=12% predicted fluid responsiveness with high specificity (92%) but poor sensitivity (63%). The forced respiratory maneuver reproducing a dyspneic state decreased the predictive power.
Due to their lack of sensitivity and their dependence to respiratory status, DeltaPP and DeltaSP are clearly less reliable to predict fluid responsiveness during SB than in mechanically ventilated patients. However, when their baseline value is high without acute right ventricular dysfunction in a participating patient, a positive response to fluid is likely.
探讨动脉脉搏(DeltaPP)和收缩压(DeltaSP)的呼吸变化是否可预测自主呼吸(SB)患者的液体反应性。由于自主呼吸(SB)期间胸腔内压力的变化可能不足以改变心室的负荷条件,因此还在强制呼吸动作期间评估了指标的性能。
前瞻性干预研究。
一家拥有34张床位的大学医院内科-外科重症监护病房。
32例有血流动力学不稳定临床体征的自主呼吸患者。
500毫升容量扩充(VE)。
通过经胸超声心动图评估,19例患者(反应者)在进行容量扩充(VE)后心脏指数至少增加15%。基线时,仅动态指标在反应者中高于无反应者(DeltaPP分别为13±5% 对7±3%,p = 0.003;DeltaSP分别为10±4% 对6±2%,p = 0.002)。此外,它们在容量扩充(VE)后显著降低(DeltaPP从11±5%降至6±4%,p < 0.001;DeltaSP从8±4%降至6±3%,p < 0.001)。DeltaPP和DeltaSP的ROC曲线下面积较高(分别为0.81±0.08和0.82±0.08;p = 0.888)。DeltaPP≥12%预测液体反应性具有高特异性(92%)但敏感性差(63%)。重现呼吸困难状态的强制呼吸动作降低了预测能力。
由于DeltaPP和DeltaSP缺乏敏感性且依赖于呼吸状态,与机械通气患者相比,它们在预测自主呼吸(SB)期间的液体反应性方面明显不太可靠。然而,当参与患者的基线值较高且无急性右心室功能障碍时,对液体的阳性反应可能发生。