Monnet Xavier, Rienzo Mario, Osman David, Anguel Nadia, Richard Christian, Pinsky Michael R, Teboul Jean-Louis
Service de Réanimation Médicale, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Bicêtre, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Université Paris XI, 78 rue du Général Leclerc, 94270 le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France.
Intensive Care Med. 2005 Sep;31(9):1195-201. doi: 10.1007/s00134-005-2731-0. Epub 2005 Jul 30.
To test whether fluid responsiveness can be predicted by the respiratory variation in aortic blood flow and/or the flow time corrected for heart rate monitored with esophageal Doppler.
Prospective study in a 24-bed medical intensive care unit of a university hospital.
38 mechanically ventilated patients with sinus rhythm and without spontaneous breathing activity in whom volume expansion was planned.
The aortic blood flow was measured using an esophageal Doppler monitoring device before and after fluid infusion (500 ml NaCl 0.9% over 10 min). The variation in aortic blood flow over a respiratory cycle between its minimal and maximal values was calculated. The flow time was also measured.
Aortic blood flow increased by at least 15% after volume expansion in 20 patients (defined as responders). Before fluid infusion the respiratory variation in aortic flow was higher in responders than in nonresponders (28+/-12% vs. 12+/-5%). It significantly decreased after volume expansion (18+/-11%) in responders only. A respiratory variation in aortic flow before volume expansion of at least 18% predicted fluid responsiveness with a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 94%. Flow time increased with fluid infusion in responders and nonresponders. A flow time corrected for heart rate below 277 ms predicted fluid responsiveness with a sensitivity of 55% and a specificity of 94%. The area under the ROC curve generated for variation in aortic blood flow ABF was greater than that generated for flow time.
The respiratory variation in aortic blood flow reliably predicts fluid responsiveness in patients with sinus rhythm and without breathing activity.
测试能否通过主动脉血流的呼吸变化和/或经食管多普勒监测的心率校正血流时间来预测液体反应性。
在一所大学医院拥有24张床位的医学重症监护病房进行的前瞻性研究。
38例计划进行容量扩充、机械通气且为窦性心律且无自主呼吸活动的患者。
在输注液体(10分钟内输注500毫升0.9%氯化钠溶液)前后,使用食管多普勒监测装置测量主动脉血流。计算一个呼吸周期内主动脉血流最小值与最大值之间的变化。同时测量血流时间。
20例患者(定义为有反应者)在容量扩充后主动脉血流至少增加15%。在输注液体前,有反应者的主动脉血流呼吸变化高于无反应者(28±12%对12±5%)。仅在有反应者中,容量扩充后该变化显著降低(18±11%)。容量扩充前主动脉血流呼吸变化至少为18%时,预测液体反应性的敏感度为90%,特异度为94%。有反应者和无反应者的血流时间均随液体输注而增加。心率校正血流时间低于277毫秒时,预测液体反应性的敏感度为55%,特异度为94%。主动脉血流变化(ABF)的ROC曲线下面积大于血流时间的ROC曲线下面积。
主动脉血流的呼吸变化可可靠地预测窦性心律且无呼吸活动患者的液体反应性。