MacDermid Joy C, Ghobrial Myriam, Quirion Karine Badra, St-Amour Mélanie, Tsui Tanya, Humphreys Dave, McCluskie John, Shewayhat Eddy, Galea Vickie
Clinical Research Lab, Hand and Upper Limb Centre, St. Joseph's Health Centre, London, Ontario, Canada.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2007 May 17;8:42. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-8-42.
There is a lack of standardized tests that assess functional performance for sustained upper extremity activity. This study describes development of a new test for measuring functional performance of the upper extremity and neck and assesses reliability and concurrent validity in patients with shoulder pathology.
A series of developmental tests were conducted to develop a protocol for assessing upper extremity tasks that required multi-level movement and sustained elevation. Kinematics of movement were investigated to inform subtask structure. Tasks and test composition were refined to fit clinical applicability criteria and pilot tested on 5 patients awaiting surgery for shoulder impingement and age-sex matched controls. Test-retest reliability was assessed on 10 subjects. Then a cohort of patients with mild to moderate (n = 17) shoulder pathology and 19 controls (17 were age-sex matched to patients) were tested to further validate the Functional Impairment Test-Hand, and Neck/Shoulder/Arm (FIT-HaNSA) by comparing it to self-reported function and measured strength. The FIT-HaNSA, DASH and SPADI were tested on a single occasion. Impairments in isometric strength were measured using hand-held dynamometry. Discriminative validity was determined by comparing scores to those of age-sex matched controls (n = 34), using ANOVA. Pearson correlations between outcome measures (n = 41) were examined to establish criterion and convergent validity.
A test protocol based on three five-minute subtasks, each either comprised of moving objects to waist-height shelves, eye-level shelves, or sustained manipulation of overhead nuts/bolts, was developed. Test scores for the latter 2 subtasks (or total scores) were different between controls as compared to either surgical-list patients with shoulder impingement or a variety of milder shoulder pathologies (p < 0.01). Test 1 correlated the highest with the DASH (r = -0.83), whereas Test 2 correlated highest with the SPADI (r = -0.76).
Initial data suggest the FIT-HaNSA provides valid assessment of impaired functional performance in patients with shoulder pathology. It discriminates between patients and controls, is related to self-reported function, and yet provides distinct information. Longitudinal testing is warranted.
目前缺乏用于评估上肢持续活动功能表现的标准化测试。本研究描述了一种用于测量上肢和颈部功能表现的新测试方法的开发过程,并评估了肩部病变患者的可靠性和同时效度。
进行了一系列的开发测试,以制定一个评估需要多级运动和持续抬高的上肢任务的方案。研究了运动学以确定子任务结构。对任务和测试组成进行了完善,以符合临床适用性标准,并在5名等待肩部撞击手术的患者和年龄性别匹配的对照组中进行了预测试。对10名受试者进行了重测信度评估。然后,对一组轻度至中度(n = 17)肩部病变患者和19名对照组(其中17名年龄性别与患者匹配)进行测试,通过将功能障碍测试-手部、颈部/肩部/手臂(FIT-HaNSA)与自我报告的功能和测量的力量进行比较,进一步验证该测试。FIT-HaNSA、DASH和SPADI在单次测试中进行。使用手持测力计测量等长力量的损伤。通过使用方差分析将分数与年龄性别匹配的对照组(n = 34)的分数进行比较来确定区分效度。检查了结果测量之间(n = 41)的皮尔逊相关性,以建立标准效度和收敛效度。
制定了一个基于三个五分钟子任务的测试方案,每个子任务包括将物体移动到腰部高度的架子、眼睛高度的架子,或持续操作头顶上方的螺母/螺栓。与肩部撞击手术名单上的患者或各种较轻的肩部病变患者相比,对照组在后面两个子任务(或总分)的测试分数不同(p < 0.01)。测试1与DASH的相关性最高(r = -0.83),而测试2与SPADI的相关性最高(r = -0.76)。
初步数据表明,FIT-HaNSA为肩部病变患者的功能表现受损提供了有效的评估。它能区分患者和对照组,与自我报告的功能相关,并且能提供独特的信息。有必要进行纵向测试。