Suppr超能文献

下腰痛:特伦德伦堡试验、主动直腿抬高试验以及主动直腿抬高过程中的呼吸模式的临床测量特性。

Low back pain: clinimetric properties of the Trendelenburg test, active straight leg raise test, and breathing pattern during active straight leg raising.

作者信息

Roussel Nathalie A, Nijs Jo, Truijen Steven, Smeuninx Line, Stassijns Gaetane

机构信息

Division of Musculoskeletal Physiotherapy, Department of Health Sciences, University College Antwerp, Belgium.

出版信息

J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2007 May;30(4):270-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2007.03.001.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Classification of patients with low back pain (LBP) into subgroups is important as considerable variability exists in the LBP population. Clinical applicable, reliable, and valid tests to differentiate patients with LBP are therefore necessary. The purpose of this study is to examine the reliability, internal consistency, and clinical importance of 3 clinical tests that analyze motor control mechanisms of the lumbopelvic region in patients with nonspecific LBP.

METHODS

Thirty-six patients with chronic nonspecific LBP volunteered for the study (cross-sectional design). The patients were examined by 2 assessors who were blinded to the results of each other. The following tests were performed: the Trendelenburg test, the active straight leg raise (ASLR) test, and the ASLR with visual inspection of the breathing pattern.

RESULTS

The test-retest reliability coefficients (kappa) were greater than 0.75 for the Trendelenburg score and greater than 0.70 for the ASLR. The interobserver reliability coefficients were greater than 0.39 for the assessment of the breathing pattern during the ASLR. The Cronbach alpha coefficient for internal consistency of the Trendelenburg and ASLR tests was greater than .73. No significant associations were found between the outcome of the tests and self-reported pain severity or disability.

CONCLUSIONS

These data provide evidence favoring the test-retest reliability of the Trendelenburg and ASLR tests in patients with LBP. The internal consistency of the outcome of these tests was high for both assessors, suggesting that these tests assess the same dimension. The interobserver reliability of the assessment of the breathing pattern was fair to moderate. Further research regarding the interobserver reliability, clinical importance, validity, and responsiveness of the Trendelenburg test, ASLR test, and breathing pattern during these tests is required.

摘要

目的

由于腰痛(LBP)人群存在相当大的变异性,将腰痛患者分类为亚组很重要。因此,需要有临床适用、可靠且有效的测试来区分腰痛患者。本研究的目的是检验3种分析非特异性腰痛患者腰骨盆区域运动控制机制的临床测试的可靠性、内部一致性和临床重要性。

方法

36例慢性非特异性腰痛患者自愿参加本研究(横断面设计)。由2名互不了解对方评估结果的评估者对患者进行检查。进行了以下测试:特伦德伦伯格试验、主动直腿抬高(ASLR)试验以及在视觉观察呼吸模式下的ASLR试验。

结果

特伦德伦伯格评分的重测可靠性系数(kappa)大于0.75,ASLR的重测可靠性系数大于0.70。ASLR期间呼吸模式评估的观察者间可靠性系数大于0.39。特伦德伦伯格试验和ASLR试验内部一致性的Cronbach α系数大于0.73。在测试结果与自我报告的疼痛严重程度或残疾之间未发现显著关联。

结论

这些数据为特伦德伦伯格试验和ASLR试验在腰痛患者中的重测可靠性提供了证据。这两种测试结果的内部一致性对两名评估者而言都很高,表明这些测试评估的是同一维度。呼吸模式评估的观察者间可靠性为中等。需要进一步研究特伦德伦伯格试验、ASLR试验以及这些试验期间呼吸模式的观察者间可靠性、临床重要性、有效性和反应性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验