Suppr超能文献

乳腺疼痛的循证管理:随机试验的荟萃分析

Evidence-based management of Mastalgia: a meta-analysis of randomised trials.

作者信息

Srivastava A, Mansel R E, Arvind N, Prasad K, Dhar A, Chabra A

机构信息

University Department of Surgery, Cardiff University, UK.

出版信息

Breast. 2007 Oct;16(5):503-12. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2007.03.003. Epub 2007 May 16.

Abstract

Several agents have been utilised for therapy of mastalgia based on data from small trials. No meta-analysis of trials on mastalgia exists. We have conducted a meta-analysis on trials on mastalgia published in the English language. Study was restricted to randomised controlled trials comparing Bromocriptine, Danazol, Evening primrose oil (EPO) and Tamoxifen with placebo. The analysis was carried out on the REVMAN statistical package. Weighted mean difference in the pain score in favour of Bromocriptine was -16.31(95% CI -26.35 to -6.27). Danazol produced a significant benefit with a mean pain score difference -20.23(95% CI -28.12 to -12.34). EPO did not offer any advantage over placebo in pain relief, mean pain score difference being -2.78 (95% CI -7.97 to 2.40). Tamoxifen achieved a relative risk (RR) of pain relief of 1.92 (95% CI 1.42-2.58). Tamoxifen is associated with least side effects and should be the drug of first choice.

摘要

基于小型试验的数据,已有多种药物被用于治疗乳腺疼痛。目前尚无关于乳腺疼痛试验的荟萃分析。我们对以英文发表的乳腺疼痛试验进行了荟萃分析。研究仅限于将溴隐亭、达那唑、月见草油(EPO)和他莫昔芬与安慰剂进行比较的随机对照试验。分析在REVMAN统计软件包上进行。支持溴隐亭的疼痛评分加权平均差为-16.31(95%置信区间-26.35至-6.27)。达那唑产生了显著益处,平均疼痛评分差为-20.23(95%置信区间-28.12至-12.34)。在缓解疼痛方面,月见草油与安慰剂相比没有任何优势,平均疼痛评分差为-2.78(95%置信区间-7.97至2.40)。他莫昔芬实现疼痛缓解的相对风险(RR)为1.92(95%置信区间1.42 - 2.58)。他莫昔芬的副作用最少,应作为首选药物。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验