• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

处方药产品替代决策支持。

Prescription drug product substitution decision support.

作者信息

Manolakis Patti Gasdek

机构信息

PMM Consulting, Charlotte, NC, USA.

出版信息

J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2007 May-Jun;47(3):328-38. doi: 10.1331/JAPhA.2007.07502.

DOI:10.1331/JAPhA.2007.07502
PMID:17510028
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To generate patient-centered, evidence-based decision support tools and compile resources that will assist pharmacists in prescription drug product substitution activities and related communication, and to present the resulting tools and resources.

DATA SOURCES

Food and Drug Administration (FDA) publications, data, and communication; peer-reviewed literature; interviews with pharmacists; structured discussions with members of the project Advisory Board; and author's own knowledge and records of events.

SUMMARY

A decision whether to substitute an alternative product for a prescribed medication is a clinically based process that must be grounded in appropriate medical evidence, therapeutic equivalence information, financial factors, and consideration of how the substitution will impact the patient. Product substitution decisions are influenced by therapeutic issues, legal matters, patient-centered concerns, and pharmacy practice factors, including work flow, supply issues, access to current resources, and misperceptions about database information. While generic substitution is clearly defined in many cases, some medication categories require special consideration, i.e., critical dose and narrow therapeutic index drugs, products with special release mechanisms, bioengineered protein products, many hormonal products, older drugs marketed before 1938 that were not subject to FDA approval, and others with limited bioequivalence data. In response to reports of the challenges pharmacists face when determining the appropriateness of product substitution and in support of their interdisciplinary efforts to improve medication use, the American Pharmacists Association (APhA) convened an advisory board to create the decision support tool featured in this article.

CONCLUSION

The U.S. health care system and patients rely on pharmacists as medication use experts to ensure that prescription drug product substitutions are appropriate. Pharmacists must be able to efficiently determine therapeutic equivalence, identify situations where further research is required, have access to timely resources for gathering information, and effectively communicate with patients and physicians about substitution issues. The prescription drug product substitution tool and related resources presented are intended to assist pharmacists in making and communicating clinically sound product substitution decisions that are patient centered, evidence based, consistent with state and federal laws and regulations, and reflective of the realities of health care today.

摘要

目的

生成以患者为中心、基于证据的决策支持工具,并汇编有助于药剂师进行处方药产品替换活动及相关沟通的资源,同时展示所得出的工具和资源。

数据来源

美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)的出版物、数据及通讯;同行评审文献;对药剂师的访谈;与项目咨询委员会成员的结构化讨论;以及作者自身的知识和事件记录。

总结

决定是否用替代产品替换处方药物是一个基于临床的过程,必须以适当的医学证据、治疗等效性信息、财务因素以及对替换将如何影响患者的考虑为基础。产品替换决策受到治疗问题、法律事项、以患者为中心的关注以及药学实践因素的影响,包括工作流程、供应问题、获取当前资源的途径以及对数据库信息的误解。虽然在许多情况下通用名替换有明确规定,但某些药物类别需要特殊考虑,即临界剂量和窄治疗指数药物、具有特殊释放机制的产品、生物工程蛋白产品、许多激素类产品、1938年以前上市且未经过FDA批准的旧药,以及其他生物等效性数据有限的药物。为应对有关药剂师在确定产品替换的适宜性时所面临挑战的报告,并支持他们为改善药物使用而开展的跨学科努力,美国药剂师协会(APhA)召集了一个咨询委员会来创建本文所介绍的决策支持工具。

结论

美国医疗保健系统和患者依赖药剂师作为药物使用专家,以确保处方药产品替换是恰当的。药剂师必须能够有效地确定治疗等效性,识别需要进一步研究的情况,获取及时的信息收集资源,并就替换问题与患者和医生进行有效沟通。所展示的处方药产品替换工具及相关资源旨在帮助药剂师做出并传达以患者为中心、基于证据、符合州和联邦法律法规且反映当今医疗保健实际情况的临床合理产品替换决策。

相似文献

1
Prescription drug product substitution decision support.处方药产品替代决策支持。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2007 May-Jun;47(3):328-38. doi: 10.1331/JAPhA.2007.07502.
2
Pharmaceutical counseling: Between evidence-based medicine and profits.药学咨询:在循证医学与利润之间
Int J Risk Saf Med. 2015;27 Suppl 1:S87-8. doi: 10.3233/JRS-150701.
3
Generic drug product equivalence: current status.仿制药等效性:现状
Am J Manag Care. 1998 Aug;4(8):1183-9; quiz 1190-2.
4
Bioequivalence and other unresolved issues in generic drug substitution.仿制药替代中的生物等效性及其他未解决问题。
Clin Ther. 2003 Nov;25(11):2875-90. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(03)80340-5.
5
Evaluating community pharmacists' perceptions of future generic substitution policy implementation: a national survey from Malaysia.评估社区药剂师对未来仿制药替代政策实施的看法:来自马来西亚的全国性调查。
Health Policy. 2010 Jan;94(1):68-75. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2009.08.011. Epub 2009 Sep 16.
6
Generic warfarin: implications for clinical practice and perceptions of anticoagulation providers.普通华法林:对临床实践及抗凝治疗医护人员认知的影响
Semin Thromb Hemost. 2004 Dec;30(6):619-26. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-861503.
7
Community pharmacists' understanding and perceptions of FDA therapeutic equivalence standards.社区药剂师对 FDA 治疗等效标准的理解和看法。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2019 Jan;15(1):77-83. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2018.03.005. Epub 2018 Mar 7.
8
Product selection, bioequivalence, and therapeutic equivalence: the generic drug market.产品选择、生物等效性与治疗等效性:仿制药市场
Drug Inf J. 1983;17(2):73-6. doi: 10.1177/009286158301700204.
9
Pharmacy and generic substitution of antiepileptic drugs: missing in action?抗癫痫药物的配药与非专利药品替换:不见行动?
Ann Pharmacother. 2007 Jun;41(6):1065-8. doi: 10.1345/aph.1K076. Epub 2007 May 15.
10
Generics and cost-effective prescribing in Belgium: does bioequivalence always translate in therapeutic equivalence?比利时的仿制药与性价比高的处方:生物等效性总能转化为治疗等效性吗?
Acta Clin Belg. 2009 Sep-Oct;64(5):406-14. doi: 10.1179/acb.2009.067.

引用本文的文献

1
Systematic literature review of the methodology for developing pharmacotherapeutic interchange guidelines and their implementation in hospitals and ambulatory care settings.关于制定药物治疗替换指南的方法及其在医院和门诊护理环境中实施情况的系统文献综述。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2019 Feb;75(2):157-170. doi: 10.1007/s00228-018-2573-7. Epub 2018 Oct 19.
2
Rational use of generic psychotropic drugs.合理使用非专利精神药物。
CNS Drugs. 2013 May;27(5):353-65. doi: 10.1007/s40263-013-0045-2.
3
The Controversy over Generic Antiepileptic Drugs.
关于通用型抗癫痫药物的争议。
J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther. 2010 Apr;15(2):81-93.
4
Generic Substitution Issues: Brand-generic Substitution, Generic-generic Substitution, and Generic Substitution of Narrow Therapeutic Index (NTI)/Critical Dose Drugs.通用名替换问题:品牌药与通用名药替换、通用名药之间的替换以及窄治疗指数(NTI)/临界剂量药物的通用名替换
Maedica (Bucur). 2011 Jan;6(1):52-8.
5
Rule-based standardised switching of drugs at the interface between primary and tertiary care.在初级医疗与三级医疗衔接处基于规则的标准化药物转换
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2008 Mar;64(3):319-27. doi: 10.1007/s00228-007-0402-5. Epub 2007 Nov 25.