• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

UGT1A1基因多态性可预测接受伊立替康治疗患者的血液学毒性。

UGT1A1 polymorphism can predict hematologic toxicity in patients treated with irinotecan.

作者信息

Côté Jean-François, Kirzin Sylvain, Kramar Andrew, Mosnier Jean-François, Diebold Marie-Danièle, Soubeyran Isabelle, Thirouard Anne-Sophie, Selves Janick, Laurent-Puig Pierre, Ychou Marc

机构信息

Institut National de la Sante et de la Recherche Medicale UMR-S775, Bases moléculaires de la réponse aux xénobiotiques, Université Paris Descartes, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, France.

出版信息

Clin Cancer Res. 2007 Jun 1;13(11):3269-75. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-2290. Epub 2007 May 17.

DOI:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-2290
PMID:17510208
Abstract

PURPOSE

Irinotecan (CPT-11) is approved in metastatic colorectal cancer treatment and can cause severe toxicity. The main purpose of our study was to assess the role of different polymorphisms on the occurrence of hematologic toxicities and disease-free survival in high-risk stage III colon cancer patients receiving 5-fluorouracil (5FU) and CPT-11 adjuvant chemotherapy regimen in a prospective randomized trial.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Four hundred patients were randomized in a phase III trial comparing LV5FU2 to LV5FU2 + CPT-11. DNA from 184 patients was extracted and genotyped to detect nucleotide polymorphism: 3435C>T for ABCB1, 6986A>G for CYP3A5, UGT1A1*28 and -3156G>A for UGT1A1.

RESULTS

Genotype frequencies were similar in both treatment arms. In the test arm, no significant difference was observed in toxicity or disease-free survival for ABCB1 and CYP3A5 polymorphisms. UGT1A128 homozygous patients showed more frequent severe hematologic toxicity (50%) than UGT1A11 homozygous patients (16.2%), P = 0.06. Moreover, patients homozygous for the mutant allele of -3156G>A UGT1A1 polymorphism showed more frequent severe hematologic toxicity (50%) than patients homozygous for wild-type allele (12.5%), P = 0.01. This toxicity occurred significantly earlier in homozygous mutant than wild-type homozygous patients (P = 0.043). In a Cox model, the hazard ratio for severe hematologic toxicity is significantly higher for patients with the A/A compared with the G/G genotype [hazard ratio, 8.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.9-37.2; P = 0.005].

CONCLUSIONS

This study supports the clinical utility of identification of UGT1A1 promoter polymorphisms before LV5FU2 + CPT-11 treatment to predict early hematologic toxicity. The -3156G>A polymorphism seems to be a better predictor than the UGT1A1 (TA)(6)TAA>(TA)(7)TAA polymorphism.

摘要

目的

伊立替康(CPT - 11)已被批准用于转移性结直肠癌的治疗,但其可导致严重毒性。我们研究的主要目的是在一项前瞻性随机试验中,评估不同基因多态性对接受5 - 氟尿嘧啶(5FU)和CPT - 11辅助化疗方案的高危III期结肠癌患者血液学毒性发生情况及无病生存期的影响。

实验设计

400例患者被随机分为III期试验,比较LV5FU2与LV5FU2 + CPT - 11。提取184例患者的DNA并进行基因分型,以检测核苷酸多态性:ABCB1的3435C>T、CYP3A5的6986A>G、UGT1A1的UGT1A1*28以及UGT1A1的 - 3156G>A。

结果

两个治疗组的基因型频率相似。在试验组中,ABCB1和CYP3A5基因多态性在毒性或无病生存期方面未观察到显著差异。UGT1A128纯合患者出现严重血液学毒性的频率(50%)高于UGT1A11纯合患者(16.2%),P = 0.06。此外,UGT1A1 - 3156G>A多态性突变等位基因纯合患者出现严重血液学毒性的频率(50%)高于野生型等位基因纯合患者(12.5%),P = 0.01。这种毒性在纯合突变患者中比野生型纯合患者出现得更早(P = 0.043)。在Cox模型中,与G/G基因型患者相比,A/A基因型患者发生严重血液学毒性的风险比显著更高[风险比,8.4;95%置信区间,1.9 - 37.2;P = 0.005]。

结论

本研究支持在LV5FU2 + CPT - 11治疗前鉴定UGT1A1启动子多态性以预测早期血液学毒性的临床实用性。 - 3156G>A多态性似乎比UGT1A1(TA)(6)TAA>(TA)(7)TAA多态性是更好的预测指标。

相似文献

1
UGT1A1 polymorphism can predict hematologic toxicity in patients treated with irinotecan.UGT1A1基因多态性可预测接受伊立替康治疗患者的血液学毒性。
Clin Cancer Res. 2007 Jun 1;13(11):3269-75. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-2290. Epub 2007 May 17.
2
Polymorphisms of UDP-glucuronosyltransferase gene and irinotecan toxicity: a pharmacogenetic analysis.尿苷二磷酸葡萄糖醛酸基转移酶基因多态性与伊立替康毒性:一项药物遗传学分析。
Cancer Res. 2000 Dec 15;60(24):6921-6.
3
UGT1A1*28 polymorphism predicts irinotecan-induced severe toxicities without affecting treatment outcome and survival in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma.UGT1A1*28基因多态性可预测伊立替康诱导的严重毒性反应,且不影响转移性结直肠癌患者的治疗效果及生存率。
Cancer. 2008 May 1;112(9):1932-40. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23370.
4
UGT1A1 predicts outcome in colorectal cancer treated with irinotecan and fluorouracil.UGT1A1 预测伊立替康和氟尿嘧啶治疗结直肠癌的疗效。
World J Gastroenterol. 2012 Dec 7;18(45):6635-44. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i45.6635.
5
UGT1A1*6, 1A7*3, and 1A9*22 genotypes predict severe neutropenia in FOLFIRI-treated metastatic colorectal cancer in two prospective studies in Japan.UGT1A1*6、1A7*3 和 1A9*22 基因型可预测日本两项前瞻性研究中接受 FOLFIRI 治疗的转移性结直肠癌患者的严重中性粒细胞减少症。
Cancer Sci. 2013 Dec;104(12):1662-9. doi: 10.1111/cas.12283. Epub 2013 Oct 27.
6
The role of UGT1A1*28 polymorphism in the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of irinotecan in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.UGT1A1*28基因多态性在转移性结直肠癌患者中对伊立替康药效学和药代动力学的影响
J Clin Oncol. 2006 Jul 1;24(19):3061-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.05.5400.
7
UGT1A1 gene variations and irinotecan treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.转移性结直肠癌患者的UGT1A1基因变异与伊立替康治疗
Br J Cancer. 2004 Aug 16;91(4):678-82. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602042.
8
Relevance of different UGT1A1 polymorphisms in irinotecan-induced toxicity: a molecular and clinical study of 75 patients.不同UGT1A1基因多态性与伊立替康所致毒性的相关性:75例患者的分子与临床研究
Clin Cancer Res. 2004 Aug 1;10(15):5151-9. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-03-0548.
9
Correlation between UGT1A1 gene polymorphism and irinotecan chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer: a study from Guangxi Zhuang.UGT1A1 基因多态性与转移性结直肠癌伊立替康化疗的相关性:来自广西壮族自治区的研究。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2020 Apr 7;20(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s12876-020-01227-w.
10
UGT1A1*28 genotype predicts gastrointestinal toxicity in patients treated with intermediate-dose irinotecan.UGT1A1*28基因型可预测接受中等剂量伊立替康治疗患者的胃肠道毒性。
Pharmacogenomics. 2009 May;10(5):733-9. doi: 10.2217/pgs.09.20.

引用本文的文献

1
A systematic review and meta-analysis of the impacts of germline pharmacogenomics on severe toxicity and symptom burden in adult patients with cancer.一项关于生殖系药物基因组学对成年癌症患者严重毒性和症状负担影响的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Transl Sci. 2024 May;17(5):e13781. doi: 10.1111/cts.13781.
2
Irinotecan-Induced Toxicity: A Pharmacogenetic Study Beyond UGT1A1.伊立替康诱导的毒性:UGT1A1 以外的药物遗传学研究。
Clin Pharmacokinet. 2023 Nov;62(11):1589-1597. doi: 10.1007/s40262-023-01279-7. Epub 2023 Sep 16.
3
Association between a single nucleotide polymorphism in the R3HCC1 gene and irinotecan toxicity.
R3HCC1 基因单核苷酸多态性与伊立替康毒性的关联。
Cancer Med. 2023 Feb;12(4):4294-4305. doi: 10.1002/cam4.5299. Epub 2022 Oct 29.
4
Pharmacogenetics of Drugs Used in the Treatment of Cancers.药物治疗癌症中的药物遗传学。
Genes (Basel). 2022 Feb 7;13(2):311. doi: 10.3390/genes13020311.
5
All You Need to Know About Genetic Testing for Patients Treated With Irinotecan: A Practitioner-Friendly Guide.关于接受伊立替康治疗的患者的基因检测:一份通俗易懂的实用指南。
JCO Oncol Pract. 2022 Apr;18(4):270-277. doi: 10.1200/OP.21.00624. Epub 2021 Dec 3.
6
Impact of UGT1A1 genotype on the efficacy and safety of irinotecan-based chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer.UGT1A1 基因型对转移性结直肠癌伊立替康为基础化疗的疗效和安全性的影响。
Cancer Sci. 2021 Nov;112(11):4669-4678. doi: 10.1111/cas.15092. Epub 2021 Aug 31.
7
Pharmacometrics-Based Considerations for the Design of a Pharmacogenomic Clinical Trial Assessing Irinotecan Safety.基于药代动力学的考虑因素在设计评估伊立替康安全性的药物基因组学临床试验中的应用。
Pharm Res. 2021 Apr;38(4):593-605. doi: 10.1007/s11095-021-03024-w. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
8
The Road so Far in Colorectal Cancer Pharmacogenomics: Are We Closer to Individualised Treatment?结直肠癌药物基因组学的现状:我们离个性化治疗更近了吗?
J Pers Med. 2020 Nov 19;10(4):237. doi: 10.3390/jpm10040237.
9
Effect of drug metabolizing enzymes and transporters in Thai colorectal cancer patients treated with irinotecan-based chemotherapy.伊立替康为基础化疗的泰国结直肠癌患者中药物代谢酶和转运体的作用。
Sci Rep. 2020 Aug 10;10(1):13486. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-70351-0.
10
SNPs in predicting clinical efficacy and toxicity of chemotherapy: walking through the quicksand.单核苷酸多态性在预测化疗的临床疗效和毒性方面:在流沙中前行。
Oncotarget. 2018 May 18;9(38):25355-25382. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.25256.