• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

台湾癌症患者照顾者照顾负担量表(照顾任务量表-癌症)的编制与测试

Development and testing of a scale to measure caregiving load in caregivers of cancer patients in Taiwan, the care task scale-cancer.

作者信息

Chen Hsiu-Chuan, Chen Mei-Ling, Lotus Shyu Yea-ing, Tang Woung-Ru

机构信息

Graduate Institute of Clinical Medical Sciences, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.

出版信息

Cancer Nurs. 2007 May-Jun;30(3):223-31. doi: 10.1097/01.NCC.0000270701.49543.64.

DOI:10.1097/01.NCC.0000270701.49543.64
PMID:17510586
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to develop and test an instrument to measure care tasks for Taiwanese spouse caregivers of cancer patients. A 37-item Care Task Scale-Cancer (CTS-C) was developed using both quantitative and qualitative approaches. The reliability and validity of the CTS-C was tested on a convenience sample of 150 spouse caregivers caring for patients with breast cancer, head neck cancer, or esophageal cancer. Factor analysis showed that the CTS-C had 4 underlying factors (subscales): (1) accompany patient and monitor care (12 items), (2) substitutive care for social and general affairs (12 items), (3) communication and emotional care (9 items), and (4) mobility maintenance care (4 items). These 4 factors explained 52.3% of the total variance. Cronbach alpha coefficients for these 4 subscales ranged from .83 to .88. Test-retest coefficients (r) ranged from 0.92 to 0.94. The construct validity of this scale was supported by demonstrating a negative correlation between CTS-C scores (demand, difficulty, and caregiving load) and functional performance status, and positive correlations with caregiver burden and symptom distress. These results showed satisfactory validity and reliability for the CTS-C.

摘要

本研究的目的是开发并测试一种工具,以测量台湾癌症患者配偶照顾者的护理任务。采用定量和定性方法开发了一个包含37个条目的癌症护理任务量表(CTS-C)。对150名照顾乳腺癌、头颈癌或食道癌患者的配偶照顾者的便利样本进行了CTS-C的信效度测试。因子分析表明,CTS-C有4个潜在因子(分量表):(1)陪伴患者并监督护理(12个条目),(2)替代社会和一般事务护理(12个条目),(3)沟通和情感护理(9个条目),以及(4)维持活动能力护理(4个条目)。这4个因子解释了总方差的52.3%。这4个分量表的克朗巴哈α系数在0.83至0.88之间。重测系数(r)在0.92至0.94之间。通过证明CTS-C分数(需求、难度和护理负担)与功能表现状态之间呈负相关,以及与照顾者负担和症状困扰呈正相关,支持了该量表的结构效度。这些结果表明CTS-C具有令人满意的效度和信度。

相似文献

1
Development and testing of a scale to measure caregiving load in caregivers of cancer patients in Taiwan, the care task scale-cancer.台湾癌症患者照顾者照顾负担量表(照顾任务量表-癌症)的编制与测试
Cancer Nurs. 2007 May-Jun;30(3):223-31. doi: 10.1097/01.NCC.0000270701.49543.64.
2
Development of the Comprehensive Inventory of Functioning-Cancer.《癌症功能综合量表》的编制
Cancer Nurs. 2007 May-Jun;30(3):205-12. doi: 10.1097/01.NCC.0000270713.18156.95.
3
Development and testing of the Oncology Patients' Perceptions of the Quality of Nursing Care Scale.肿瘤患者对护理质量感知量表的开发与测试
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2003 Mar-Apr;30(2):283-90. doi: 10.1188/03.ONF.283-290.
4
Reliability and validity of the caregiver quality of life index-cancer (CQOLC) scale in Turkish cancer caregivers.土耳其癌症照护者生活质量指数-癌症(CQOLC)量表的信效度研究
J Clin Nurs. 2009 Nov;18(21):3003-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.02915.x. Epub 2009 Sep 4.
5
Hidden morbidity in cancer: spouse caregivers.癌症中的隐性发病情况:配偶照料者
J Clin Oncol. 2007 Oct 20;25(30):4829-34. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.10.0909.
6
Preliminary psychometric testing of the Fox Simple Quality-of-Life Scale.福克斯简易生活质量量表的初步心理测量测试。
J Neurosci Nurs. 2004 Jun;36(3):157-66.
7
Development and psychometric testing of the relocation self-efficacy scale.搬迁自我效能感量表的编制与心理测量学测试
Nurs Res. 2007 Jul-Aug;56(4):244-51. doi: 10.1097/01.NNR.0000280609.16244.de.
8
Caregiver burden and symptom distress in people with cancer receiving hospice care.接受临终关怀的癌症患者的照护者负担与症状困扰
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2001 Oct;28(9):1469-74.
9
Post-traumatic growth in advanced cancer patients receiving palliative care.接受姑息治疗的晚期癌症患者的创伤后成长
Br J Health Psychol. 2008 Nov;13(Pt 4):633-46. doi: 10.1348/135910707X246177. Epub 2007 Oct 5.
10
Mutuality and preparedness moderate the effects of caregiving demand on cancer family caregiver outcomes.相互性和准备状态调节了照顾需求对癌症家庭照顾者结果的影响。
Nurs Res. 2007 Nov-Dec;56(6):425-33. doi: 10.1097/01.NNR.0000299852.75300.03.

引用本文的文献

1
Self-Assessment Instruments for Supporting Family Caregivers: An Integrative Review.支持家庭照顾者的自我评估工具:一项综合综述。
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 May 14;12(10):1016. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12101016.
2
Identification of resources and skills developed by partners of patients with advanced colon cancer: a qualitative study.鉴定晚期结肠癌患者的合作伙伴所拥有的资源和技能:一项定性研究。
Support Care Cancer. 2018 Dec;26(12):4121-4131. doi: 10.1007/s00520-018-4283-1. Epub 2018 Jun 5.
3
Long-Term Effectiveness of Combined Treatment with Traditional Chinese Medicine and Western Medicine on the Prognosis of Patients with Lung Cancer.
中西医结合治疗对肺癌患者预后的长期疗效
J Altern Complement Med. 2016 Mar;22(3):212-22. doi: 10.1089/acm.2015.0214.