Larøi Frank, Woodward Todd S
Cognitive Psychopathology Unit, University of Liège, Belgium, and Department of Research, Riverview Hospital, Coquitlam, British Columbia, Canada.
Harv Rev Psychiatry. 2007 May-Jun;15(3):109-17. doi: 10.1080/10673220701401993.
Although the phenomenological diversity of hallucinations has been well documented, experimental investigations into their cognitive underpinnings have not yet reflected this complexity. Our goal in this review is to contrast the restricted set of experimental conditions that have been utilized in source-monitoring studies of hallucinations with their documented phenomenological diversity. In particular, we initially focus on the theoretical distinction between origin and source that has been recognized at the level of phenomenology, and then review the source-monitoring literature within this theoretical framework. In addition, we touch on several other aspects of the phenomenological diversity of hallucinations that have not yet been sufficiently investigated experimentally--namely, intentionality, affect, and motivational factors. Finally, we list other methodological problems that may have led to inconsistencies in the literature. We conclude with concrete recommendations for future source-monitoring investigations of hallucinations.
尽管幻觉在现象学上的多样性已有充分记录，但对其认知基础的实验研究尚未反映出这种复杂性。本综述的目的是将幻觉源监测研究中所采用的有限实验条件与已记录的现象学多样性进行对比。具体而言，我们首先关注在现象学层面已得到认可的起源与来源之间的理论区别，然后在此理论框架内回顾源监测文献。此外，我们还涉及幻觉现象学多样性中其他几个尚未得到充分实验研究的方面，即意向性、情感和动机因素。最后，我们列出可能导致文献中出现不一致情况的其他方法学问题。我们以对未来幻觉源监测研究的具体建议作为结论。
