Zilelioğlu Güler, Hoşal Banu M
Department of Ophthalmology, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.
Orbit. 2007 Mar;26(1):1-3. doi: 10.1080/01676830600972807.
To evaluate the results of lacrimal probing in children at or older than 1 year of age with congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.
Fifty eyes of 38 children (24 males, 14 females) with congenital epiphora who underwent nasolacrimal duct probing were evaluated in a prospective study. The age of the patients was between 12 and 101 months (mean: 33 months). Success of probing was defined as complete resolution of preoperative symptoms and signs. The mean follow-up was 8 months (3-28 months).
The success rate of probing was 88% (44/50 eyes). Residual epiphora was observed in 6 eyes of 4 patients (12%). Age of the patient, gender, the frequency of epiphora before probing and the unilaterality or bilaterality of epiphora did not correlate with the success of probing (p > 0.05).
Nasolacrimal duct probing is advocated as a primary treatment in children younger than 9 years of age before proceeding to more complex treatment options. Unsuccessful probing may result from the selection of nonmembranous obstructions rather than the increased age of the patients.
评估1岁及以上患有先天性鼻泪管阻塞的儿童进行泪道探通术的结果。
在一项前瞻性研究中,对38例(男24例,女14例)患有先天性泪溢并接受鼻泪管探通术的儿童的50只眼睛进行了评估。患者年龄在12至101个月之间(平均33个月)。探通成功定义为术前症状和体征完全消失。平均随访时间为8个月(3至28个月)。
探通成功率为88%(44/50只眼)。4例患者的6只眼(12%)出现残留泪溢。患者年龄、性别、探通术前泪溢频率以及泪溢的单侧或双侧性与探通成功与否无关(p>0.05)。
在考虑采用更复杂的治疗方案之前,提倡对9岁以下儿童将鼻泪管探通术作为主要治疗方法。探通失败可能是由于选择了非膜性阻塞而非患者年龄增加所致。