Suppr超能文献

联合区域-全身麻醉:基于瑞芬太尼的全身麻醉及术后硬膜外镇痛评估

Combined regional-general anesthesia: evaluation of remifentanil based general anesthesia and postoperative epidural analgesia.

作者信息

Tohme W, Kafrouni H, Sfeir S

机构信息

PGY, III University of Balamand, St Georges Hospital, Beirut, Lebanon.

出版信息

Middle East J Anaesthesiol. 2007 Feb;19(1):97-110.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate whether remifentanil based general anesthesia combined with epidural analgesia for postoperative pain, has any advantages with respect to consumption of drugs, blood loss, quality of pain control, hemodynamic profile, in major abdominal surgery, as compared to other combined techniques.

METHODS

A retrospective study based on chart reviews of patients who have undergone colectomy, radical cystectomy and radical prostatectomy over one year period in our Institution, operated under combined regional-general anesthesia. Twenty-six patients were analyzed and were divided into three groups according to the type of anesthesia received. Group A: combined general-epidural for per-operative and postoperative pain (10 patients). Group B: combined spinal-general anesthesia (8 patients) post-operative analgesia consisted of parenteral mepiridine and paracetamol. Group C: remifentanil based general anesthesia followed by epidural for postoperative analgesia (8 patients).

RESULTS

The demographic data, age and M/F distribution were comparable in the three groups. The remifentanil group showed less utilization of muscle relaxant (Cisatracurium) with respect to other groups (p < 0.001). The amount of intraoperative blood loss was not significantly different among the three groups. The efficacy of the postoperative epidural analgesia was demonstrated by the minimal utilization of analgesics (p < 0.05 and 0.01) in group A and C as compared to group B. In the group of remifentanil, the blood pressure was more stable and maintained at a systolic of 80-100 mmHg as compared to initial hypotension mainly in group C.

CONCLUSION

The use of remifentanil based general anesthesia offers the advantage of non-accumulation of drugs and hemodynamic stability. Post-operative analgesia can be provided by epidural route which proved to be satisfactory in the remifentanil group. The effect on blood loss was not conclusive in this study.

摘要

目的

评估在大型腹部手术中,与其他联合技术相比,基于瑞芬太尼的全身麻醉联合硬膜外镇痛用于术后疼痛控制,在药物消耗、失血、疼痛控制质量、血流动力学方面是否具有优势。

方法

一项回顾性研究,基于对我院一年内接受结肠切除术、根治性膀胱切除术和根治性前列腺切除术的患者病历回顾,这些患者均在区域 - 全身联合麻醉下进行手术。分析了26例患者,并根据所接受的麻醉类型分为三组。A组:全身 - 硬膜外联合用于术中及术后疼痛(10例患者)。B组:腰麻 - 全身联合麻醉(8例患者),术后镇痛采用胃肠外注射哌替啶和对乙酰氨基酚。C组:基于瑞芬太尼的全身麻醉,随后采用硬膜外进行术后镇痛(8例患者)。

结果

三组患者的人口统计学数据、年龄及男女分布具有可比性。与其他组相比,瑞芬太尼组肌肉松弛剂(顺式阿曲库铵)的使用量较少(p < 0.001)。三组术中失血量无显著差异。与B组相比,A组和C组镇痛药使用量最少(p < 0.05和0.01),证明了术后硬膜外镇痛的效果。在瑞芬太尼组,血压更稳定,收缩压维持在80 - 100 mmHg,而主要在C组初始时出现低血压。

结论

使用基于瑞芬太尼的全身麻醉具有药物无蓄积和血流动力学稳定的优势。术后镇痛可通过硬膜外途径提供,在瑞芬太尼组效果令人满意。本研究中对失血的影响尚无定论。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验