Suppr超能文献

在接受腹部大手术的患者中,采用固定剂量肌内注射吗啡与硬膜外注射吗啡或舒芬太尼及布比卡因进行术后镇痛的比较。

Postoperative analgesia with intramuscular morphine at fixed rate versus epidural morphine or sufentanil and bupivacaine in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery.

作者信息

Broekema A A, Veen A, Fidler V, Gielen M J, Hennis P J

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospital Groningen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Anesth Analg. 1998 Dec;87(6):1346-53.

PMID:9842825
Abstract

UNLABELLED

We assessed the efficacy and side effects of postoperative analgesia with three different pain regimens in 90 patients undergoing major abdominal surgery. The patients were randomly assigned to one of three groups: epidural morphine (EM) or sufentanil (ES), both combined with bupivacaine, or IM morphine (IM) at fixed intervals. Before incision, patients in the epidural groups received sufentanil or morphine in bupivacaine via a thoracic catheter, followed by a continuous infusion 1 h later. General anesthesia consisted of N2O/O2 and isoflurane for all groups. Patients in all groups received IV sufentanil as part of their anesthetic management. Patients in the IM group received IV sufentanil 1 microg/kg before incision, and patients in all groups received sufentanil 10 microg for inadequate analgesia. Postoperatively, the epidural or IM treatment was continued for > or =5 days. Postoperative analgesia at rest and during coughing and movement was significantly better in the epidural groups than in the IM group during the 5 consecutive days. There were no significant differences between the epidural groups. The incidence of most side effects was similar in all groups. We conclude that epidural analgesia provided better pain relief than IM analgesia, even if the latter was optimized by fixed-dose administration at fixed intervals and included adjustments on demand. Epidural sufentanil and morphine, both combined with bupivacaine, seemed to be equally effective with similar side effects.

IMPLICATIONS

Postoperative analgesia with epidural sufentanil or morphine and bupivacaine after major abdominal surgery seemed to be better than the conventional method of IM morphine treatment, despite optimal administration, i.e., fixed doses at fixed intervals with regular adjustments. Analgesic efficacy and side effects of epidural sufentanil and morphine were similar.

摘要

未标注

我们评估了三种不同疼痛治疗方案用于90例接受腹部大手术患者术后镇痛的疗效和副作用。患者被随机分为三组之一:硬膜外吗啡(EM)或舒芬太尼(ES),两者均与布比卡因联合使用,或固定间隔肌肉注射吗啡(IM)。在切口前,硬膜外组患者通过胸段导管接受布比卡因中的舒芬太尼或吗啡,1小时后开始持续输注。所有组的全身麻醉均由N2O/O2和异氟烷组成。所有组的患者均接受静脉注射舒芬太尼作为麻醉管理的一部分。IM组患者在切口前接受静脉注射舒芬太尼1μg/kg,所有组患者在镇痛不足时接受舒芬太尼10μg。术后,硬膜外或IM治疗持续≥5天。在连续5天内,硬膜外组患者静息时以及咳嗽和活动时的术后镇痛效果明显优于IM组。硬膜外组之间无显著差异。大多数副作用的发生率在所有组中相似。我们得出结论,硬膜外镇痛比IM镇痛提供更好的疼痛缓解,即使后者通过固定间隔固定剂量给药并按需调整进行了优化。硬膜外舒芬太尼和吗啡与布比卡因联合使用似乎同样有效,副作用相似。

启示

腹部大手术后使用硬膜外舒芬太尼或吗啡与布比卡因进行术后镇痛似乎优于传统的IM吗啡治疗方法,尽管进行了优化给药,即固定间隔固定剂量并定期调整。硬膜外舒芬太尼和吗啡的镇痛效果和副作用相似。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验