Chávez Susana, Coe Anna-Britt
Executive Director, Centro de Promoción y Defensa de los Derechos Sexuales y Reproductivos, Lima, Peru.
Reprod Health Matters. 2007 May;15(29):139-48. doi: 10.1016/S0968-8080(07)29296-1.
Inclusion of emergency contraception in national family planning programmes is consistent with international agreements that countries should strive to ensure access to a wide range of contraceptive methods and promote voluntary, informed choice. Yet in 2005, USAID/Peru requested that its NGO grantees in Peru take a "neutral" position on emergency contraception in activities or materials that involve its funds. For many decades, donor countries have viewed conservative religious forces in low-income countries as an obstacle to expanding family planning programmes. Today, however, far-right organisations in the United States are having an unprecedented influence on US public policy, including in countries such as Peru. This article analyses shifts in USAID/Peru's policy on emergency contraception in Peru since 1992. In Peru today, there is widespread official and public support for making emergency contraception available. Given USAID's long support for family planning internationally and in Peru, the current policy appears to be the result of attacks by US far-right organisations carried out in synergy with sympathetic US public officials and anti-choice Peruvian allies.
将紧急避孕纳入国家计划生育项目符合国际协定,即各国应努力确保提供广泛的避孕方法,并促进自愿、知情选择。然而,2005年,美国国际开发署/秘鲁要求其在秘鲁的非政府组织受赠方在涉及美国国际开发署资金的活动或材料中,对紧急避孕采取“中立”立场。几十年来,捐助国一直将低收入国家的保守宗教势力视为扩大计划生育项目的障碍。然而如今,美国的极右翼组织对美国公共政策,包括在秘鲁等国的政策,正产生前所未有的影响。本文分析了自1992年以来美国国际开发署/秘鲁在秘鲁紧急避孕政策上的转变。如今在秘鲁,官方和公众普遍支持提供紧急避孕措施。鉴于美国国际开发署长期以来在国际上以及在秘鲁对计划生育的支持,当前政策似乎是美国极右翼组织与持同情态度的美国公职人员以及反堕胎的秘鲁盟友协同发动攻击的结果。