Pérez-González Antonio, Fenollosa-Esteve Carlos, Sancho-Bru Joaquín L, Sánchez-Marín Francisco T, Vergara Margarita, Rodríguez-Cervantes Pablo J
Departamento de Ingeniería Mecánica y Construcción, Campus de Riu Sec, Universitat Jaume I, Castellón, Spain.
Med Eng Phys. 2008 Apr;30(3):387-98. doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2007.04.001. Epub 2007 May 21.
Different models have been used in the literature for the simulation of surface contact in biomechanical knee models. However, there is a lack of systematic comparisons of these models applied to the simulation of a common case, which will provide relevant information about their accuracy and suitability for application in models of the implanted knee. In this work a comparison of the Hertz model (HM), the elastic foundation model (EFM) and the finite element model (FEM) for the simulation of the elastic contact in a 3D model of the prosthetic knee is presented. From the results of this comparison it is found that although the nature of the EFM offers advantages when compared with that of the HM for its application to realistic prosthetic surfaces, and when compared with the FEM in CPU time, its predictions can differ from FEM in some circumstances. These differences are considerable if the comparison is performed for prescribed displacements, although they are less important for prescribed loads. To solve these problems a new modified elastic foundation model (mEFM) is proposed that maintains basically the simplicity of the original model while producing much more accurate results. In this paper it is shown that this new mEFM calculates pressure distribution and contact area with accuracy and short computation times for toroidal contacting surfaces. Although further work is needed to confirm its validity for more complex geometries the mEFM is envisaged as a good option for application in 3D knee models to predict prosthetic knee performance.
文献中已使用不同模型来模拟生物力学膝关节模型中的表面接触。然而,缺乏对这些模型应用于常见情况模拟的系统比较,而这种比较将提供有关其准确性以及在植入式膝关节模型中应用适用性的相关信息。在这项工作中,展示了对赫兹模型(HM)、弹性基础模型(EFM)和有限元模型(FEM)在三维人工膝关节模型弹性接触模拟方面的比较。从该比较结果发现,尽管EFM的特性在应用于实际人工关节表面时相较于HM具有优势,并且在计算时间方面相较于FEM具有优势,但其预测在某些情况下可能与FEM不同。如果针对规定位移进行比较,这些差异会相当大,尽管对于规定载荷而言它们不太重要。为解决这些问题,提出了一种新的改进弹性基础模型(mEFM),该模型在保持原模型基本简单性的同时能产生更为精确的结果。本文表明,这种新的mEFM能够精确计算环形接触表面的压力分布和接触面积,且计算时间较短。尽管需要进一步开展工作以确认其对更复杂几何形状的有效性,但mEFM被视为应用于三维膝关节模型以预测人工膝关节性能的一个不错选择。