Ronse De Craene Louis P
Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh, 20A Inverleith Row, Edinburgh EH3 5LR, UK.
Ann Bot. 2007 Sep;100(3):621-30. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcm076. Epub 2007 May 18.
The aim of this paper is to discuss the controversial origins of petals from tepals or stamens and the links between the morphological expression of petals and floral organ identity genes in the core eudicots.
I challenge the widely held classical view that petals are morphologically derived from stamens in the core eudicots, and sepals from tepals or bracts. Morphological data suggest that tepal-derived petals have evolved independently in the major lineages of the core eudicots (i.e. asterids, Santalales and rosids) from Berberidopsis-like prototypes, and that staminodial petals have arisen only in few isolated cases where petals had been previously lost (Caryophyllales, Rosales). The clear correlation between continuous changes in petal morphology, and a scenario that indicates numerous duplications to have taken place in genes controlling floral organ development, can only be fully understood within a phylogenetic context. B-gene expression plays a fundamental role in the evolution of the petals by controlling petaloidy, but it does not clarify petal homology.
An increased synorganization of the flower in the core eudicots linked with the establishment of floral whorls restricts the petaloid gene expression to the second whorl, reducing the similarities of petals with tepals from which they were originally derived. An increased flower size linked with secondary polyandry or polycarpelly may lead to a breakdown of the restricted gene expression and a reversal to ancestral characteristics of perianth development. An altered 'sliding boundary' hypothesis is proposed for the core eudicots to explain shifts in petaloidy of the perianth and the event of staminodial petals. The repetitive changes of function in the perianth of the core eudicots are linked with shifts in petaloidy to the outer perianth whorl, or losses of petal or sepal whorls that can be secondarily compensated for by the inclusion of bracts in the flower. The origin and evolution of petals appears to be as complex on a molecular basis as it is from a morphological point of view.
本文旨在探讨花瓣起源于花被片或雄蕊这一存在争议的问题,以及核心真双子叶植物中花瓣的形态表达与花器官同源异型基因之间的联系。
我对一种广泛持有的经典观点提出质疑,即核心真双子叶植物中花瓣在形态上起源于雄蕊,萼片起源于花被片或苞片。形态学数据表明,起源于花被片的花瓣在核心真双子叶植物的主要类群(即菊类植物、檀香目和蔷薇类植物)中已从类似刺叶藤属植物的原型独立进化而来,而退化雄蕊状花瓣仅在少数先前花瓣已缺失的孤立案例中出现(石竹目、蔷薇目)。花瓣形态的持续变化与表明在控制花器官发育的基因中发生了大量重复的一种情况之间的明显关联,只有在系统发育背景下才能得到充分理解。B 基因的表达通过控制花瓣化在花瓣的进化中起着基本作用,但它并未阐明花瓣的同源性。
核心真双子叶植物中花的协同组织增加以及花轮的建立将花瓣化基因的表达限制在第二轮,减少了花瓣与它们最初所源自的花被片之间的相似性。与次生多雄蕊或多心皮相关的花大小增加可能导致受限基因表达的崩溃,并逆转至花被发育的祖先特征。针对核心真双子叶植物提出了一种改变的“滑动边界”假说,以解释花被的花瓣化转变和退化雄蕊状花瓣的出现。核心真双子叶植物花被中功能的重复变化与花瓣化向外部花被轮的转变或花瓣或萼片轮的缺失有关,这些缺失可通过在花中纳入苞片而得到次生补偿。花瓣的起源和进化在分子基础上似乎与从形态学角度来看一样复杂。