Singler Boris, Tröster Andreas, Manering Neil, Schüttler Jürgen, Koppert Wolfgang
Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
Anesth Analg. 2007 Jun;104(6):1397-403, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000261305.22324.f3.
Experimental and clinical studies suggest that brief opioid exposure can enhance pain sensitivity. During anesthesia, however, opioids are commonly administered in combination with either IV or inhaled hypnotic drugs. In this investigation we sought to determine the analgesic and antihyperalgesic properties of propofol in subhypnotic concentrations on remifentanil-induced postinfusion hypersensitivity in an experimental human pain model.
Fifteen healthy volunteers were included in this randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled study in a cross-over design. Transcutaneous electrical stimulation at high current densities (41.7 +/- 14.3 mA) induced spontaneous acute pain (numerical rating scale = 6 of 10) and stable areas of hyperalgesia. Pain intensities and areas of hyperalgesia were assessed before, during and after a 30 min target-controlled infusion of propofol (1.5 microg/mL) and remifentanil (0.05 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1)), either alone or in combination (propofol 1.5 microg/mL with remifentanil 0.025 or 0.05 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1)).
During infusion, propofol significantly reduced the electrically evoked pain to 72% +/- 21% of control. Subhypnotic concentrations of propofol did not lead to any hyperalgesic effects. Coadministration of remifentanil led to synergistic analgesic effects (to 62% +/- 26% and 58% +/- 25% of control, for 0.025 or 0.05 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1), respectively), but upon withdrawal, pain and hyperalgesia increased above control level.
The results suggest clinically relevant interactions of propofol and remifentanil in humans, since propofol led to a delay and a weakening of remifentanil-induced postinfusion anti-analgesia in humans. Nevertheless, pronociceptive effects were not completely antagonized by propofol, which may account for the increased demand for analgesics after remifentanil-based anesthesia in clinical practice.
实验和临床研究表明,短期接触阿片类药物可增强疼痛敏感性。然而,在麻醉期间,阿片类药物通常与静脉注射或吸入性催眠药物联合使用。在本研究中,我们试图在实验性人体疼痛模型中,确定亚催眠浓度的丙泊酚对瑞芬太尼诱导的输注后痛觉过敏的镇痛和抗痛觉过敏特性。
15名健康志愿者参与了这项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的交叉设计研究。高电流密度(41.7±14.3 mA)的经皮电刺激诱发自发性急性疼痛(数字评分量表为10分中的6分)和稳定的痛觉过敏区域。在30分钟的丙泊酚(1.5微克/毫升)和瑞芬太尼(0.05微克·千克⁻¹·分钟⁻¹)靶控输注之前、期间和之后,单独或联合(丙泊酚1.5微克/毫升与瑞芬太尼0.025或0.05微克·千克⁻¹·分钟⁻¹)评估疼痛强度和痛觉过敏区域。
输注期间,丙泊酚显著将电诱发疼痛降低至对照值的72%±21%。亚催眠浓度的丙泊酚未产生任何痛觉过敏效应。瑞芬太尼联合给药产生协同镇痛作用(分别为对照值的62%±26%和58%±25%,对应0.025或0.05微克·千克⁻¹·分钟⁻¹),但停药后,疼痛和痛觉过敏增加至对照水平以上。
结果表明丙泊酚和瑞芬太尼在人体中存在临床相关的相互作用,因为丙泊酚导致了瑞芬太尼诱导的人体输注后抗镇痛作用的延迟和减弱。然而,丙泊酚并未完全拮抗伤害感受作用,这可能解释了临床实践中基于瑞芬太尼麻醉后对镇痛药需求增加的原因。