Michaud David S, Miller Susan M, Ferrarotto Catherine, Konkle Anne T M, Keith Stephen E, Campbell Kenneth B
Consumer and Clinical Radiation Protection Bureau, Health Canada, Ottawa, Canada.
Noise Health. 2006 Jan-Mar;8(30):30-9. doi: 10.4103/1463-1741.32465.
The goals of this study were twofold. First, we assessed if waking salivary hormone profiles are altered by nighttime noise exposure in a laboratory environment. Second, we evaluated the potential influence that sleeping in the lab in itself may have had on salivary biomarkers, by comparing results obtained following sleep at home. Twelve adults (7 males, 5 females) between 19-25 yrs slept at home and in a sleep laboratory. Subjects provided six saliva samples during waking hours on the day prior to sleep in the lab, on both days after sleeping in the lab and on the day following the resumption of sleep at home. Following one night of adaptation, subjects were exposed throughout the 2nd night to simulated backup alarms that consisted of trains of 5 consecutive 500 ms duration audible tones. The time between the onset of each tone was 1 s and the time between trains (offset to onset) was 15 to 20 s. When compared to home conditions, cortisol and melatonin levels were higher following sleep in the laboratory 30 minutes after awakening. However, no significant differences were noted for any salivary biomarker between the 1st and 2nd night in the sleep lab, suggesting that these endpoints were not influenced by exposure to noise on the 2nd night. Waking profiles of alpha-amylase were not influenced by where the subjects slept. Subjective reports of sleep disturbance following sleep in the lab were also obtained. For most of the day there was no apparent influence of the laboratory noise exposure. However, subjects did report more sleepiness during the evening (8 pm) following the 2nd night in the laboratory. In general, overall sleep quality was rated slightly higher upon awakening from sleep at home. Factors that might have contributed to the observations in this study are discussed, including those related to the potentially non-representative sample.
本研究有两个目标。其一,我们评估了在实验室环境中夜间噪声暴露是否会改变清醒时的唾液激素水平。其二,通过比较在家中睡眠后获得的结果,我们评估了在实验室睡眠本身可能对唾液生物标志物产生的潜在影响。12名年龄在19至25岁之间的成年人(7名男性,5名女性)分别在家中和睡眠实验室睡觉。受试者在实验室睡眠前一天的清醒时间、在实验室睡眠后的两天以及在家中恢复睡眠后的当天提供了六份唾液样本。经过一晚的适应后,受试者在第二个晚上全程暴露于模拟备用警报声中,该警报声由一连串持续500毫秒的可听音调组成,每次音调持续5次,每次音调之间的时间间隔为1秒,连续音调之间的时间间隔(结束到开始)为15至20秒。与在家中的情况相比,醒来30分钟后在实验室睡眠后的皮质醇和褪黑激素水平更高。然而,睡眠实验室的第一晚和第二晚之间,任何唾液生物标志物均未发现显著差异,这表明这些指标不受第二晚噪声暴露的影响。α-淀粉酶的清醒水平不受受试者睡眠地点的影响。我们还获得了在实验室睡眠后睡眠干扰的主观报告。在一天中的大部分时间里,实验室噪声暴露没有明显影响。然而,受试者确实报告说,在实验室的第二个晚上之后的晚上(晚上8点)更困倦。总体而言,从家中睡眠醒来后,整体睡眠质量的评分略高。我们讨论了可能导致本研究观察结果的因素,包括那些与潜在的非代表性样本相关的因素。