Crowley Stephanie J, Lee Clara, Tseng Christine Y, Fogg Louis F, Eastman Charmane I
Biological Rhythms Research Laboratory, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.
Sleep. 2004 Sep 15;27(6):1077-87. doi: 10.1093/sleep/27.6.1077.
To assess performance, alertness, and mood during the night shift and subsequent daytime sleep in relation to the degree of re-alignment (re-entrainment) of circadian rhythms with a night-work, day-sleep schedule.
Subjects spent 5 consecutive night shifts (11:00 pm-7:00 am) in the lab and slept at home in darkened bedrooms (8:30 am-3:30 pm). Subjects were categorized by the degree of re-entrainment attained after the 5 night shifts. Completely re-entrained: temperature minimum in the second half of daytime sleep; partially re-entrained: temperature minimum in the first half of daytime sleep; not re-entrained: temperature minimum did not delay enough to reach daytime sleep.
See above.
Young healthy adults (n = 67) who were not shift workers.
Included bright light during the night shifts, sunglasses worn outside, a fixed dark daytime sleep episode, and melatonin. The effects of various combinations of these interventions on circadian re-entrainment were previously reported. Here we report how the degree of re-entrainment affected daytime sleep and measures collected during the night shift.
Salivary melatonin was collected every 30 minutes in dim light (<20 lux) before and after the night shifts to determine the dim light melatonin onset, and the temperature minimum was estimated by adding a constant (7 hours) to the dim light melatonin onset. Subjects kept sleep logs, which were verified by actigraphy. The Neurobehavioral Assessment Battery was completed several times during each night shift. Baseline sleep schedules and circadian phase differed among the 3 re-entrainment groups, with later times resulting in more re-entrainment. The Neurobehavioral Assessment Battery showed that performance, sleepiness, and mood were better in the groups that re-entrained compared to the group that did not re-entrain, but there were no significant differences between the partial and complete re-entrainment groups. Subjects slept almost all of the allotted 7 hours during the day, and duration did not significantly differ among the re-entrainment groups.
In young people, complete re-entrainment to the night-shift day-sleep schedule is not necessary to produce substantial benefits in neurobehavioral measures; partial re-entrainment (delaying the temperature minimum into the beginning of daytime sleep) is sufficient. The group that did not re-entrain shows that a reasonable amount of daytime sleep is not enough to produce good neurobehavioral performance during the night shift. Therefore, some re-alignment of circadian rhythms is recommended.
评估夜班期间及随后白天睡眠时的工作表现、警觉性和情绪,以及与昼夜节律重新调整(重新同步)程度相关的昼夜节律与夜班-白天睡眠时间表的关系。
受试者在实验室连续进行5个夜班(晚上11点至早上7点),并在家中黑暗的卧室睡觉(早上8点30分至下午3点30分)。根据5个夜班后达到的重新同步程度对受试者进行分类。完全重新同步:白天睡眠后半段体温最低;部分重新同步:白天睡眠前半段体温最低;未重新同步:体温最低延迟不足,未达到白天睡眠时段。
见上文。
非轮班工作的年轻健康成年人(n = 67)。
包括夜班期间的强光照射、外出时佩戴太阳镜、固定的白天黑暗睡眠时段以及褪黑素。此前已报道了这些干预措施的各种组合对昼夜节律重新同步的影响。在此我们报告重新同步程度如何影响白天睡眠以及夜班期间收集的测量数据。
在夜班前后,每隔30分钟在暗光(<20勒克斯)条件下收集唾液褪黑素,以确定暗光褪黑素起始时间,并通过在暗光褪黑素起始时间上加一个常数(7小时)来估计体温最低值。受试者记录睡眠日志,并通过活动记录仪进行核实。在每个夜班期间多次完成神经行为评估量表。3个重新同步组的基线睡眠时间表和昼夜节律相位不同,时间越晚重新同步程度越高。神经行为评估量表显示,与未重新同步的组相比,重新同步的组在工作表现、嗜睡程度和情绪方面更好,但部分重新同步组和完全重新同步组之间没有显著差异。受试者在白天几乎睡满了分配的7小时,重新同步组之间的睡眠时间没有显著差异。
在年轻人中,要在神经行为测量方面产生显著益处并不一定需要完全重新同步到夜班-白天睡眠时间表;部分重新同步(将体温最低值延迟到白天睡眠开始时)就足够了。未重新同步的组表明,合理的白天睡眠时间不足以在夜班期间产生良好的神经行为表现。因此,建议对昼夜节律进行一定程度的重新调整。