Suppr超能文献

日本国立放射医学综合研究所(NIRS)与德国重离子研究中心(GSI)碳离子剂量指定方法的比较。

Comparison of the Methods of Specifying Carbon Ion Doses at NIRS and GSI.

作者信息

Gueulette John, Wambersie André

机构信息

Université catholique de Louvain, Laboratoire d'Imagerie Médicale et de Radiothérapie Expérimentale (IMRE-5469).

出版信息

J Radiat Res. 2007;48 Suppl A:A97-A102. doi: 10.1269/jrr.48.a97.

Abstract

Due to the RBE variations, the carbon-ion doses (in Gy) are no longer sufficient to monitor adequately the biological effect of these radiations. Therefore, "RBE dose weighting factors" - W(RBE) - allowing for the RBE variations with energy, dose and biological system have to be introduced in the treatment plans in order to provide the physician with interpretable information. This paper compares the methods employed for this purpose at NIRS and GSI, which are specific of the beam delivery system of these institutions. NIRS has a "passive" beam delivery system where the dose distribution in the SOBP is determined by a Ridge filter. The dose distribution - and thus, the shaping of the filter - is chosen according to the clinical situation and determined with respect to W(RBE) factors in order to yield a biologically iso-effective SOBP. W(RBE )factors in the SOBP are at first derived from a RBE/LET function for HSG cells, then normalized to 3 at a LET of 80 keV/mum. The latter value of 3 corresponds to the clinical RBE of NIRS-neutrons, which were found to exhibit the same radiobiological properties as 80 keV/mum carbon-ions. GSI has a "dynamic" beam delivery system ("spot" or "voxel" scanning) making it possible to irradiate irregular volumes and to modulate the radiation intensity according to the radiosensitivity of different tissues and/or different sub-volumes. Due to the "power" and the resulting complexity of the system, W(RBE )factors are determined through an integrated calculation code allowing iterative interaction of both physical and radiobiological parameters. The "Local Effect Model" (LEM) was developed in this view with the aim of deriving carbon-ion W(RBE )factors from the parameters determining the response to photons. Advantages and weaknesses of the respective methods will be discussed.

摘要

由于相对生物效应(RBE)的变化,碳离子剂量(以戈瑞计)已不足以充分监测这些辐射的生物学效应。因此,为了向医生提供可解释的信息,必须在治疗计划中引入“RBE剂量权重因子”——W(RBE),该因子考虑了RBE随能量、剂量和生物系统的变化。本文比较了日本放射医学综合研究所(NIRS)和德国重离子研究中心(GSI)为此目的所采用的方法,这些方法特定于这些机构的束流传输系统。NIRS拥有一个“被动”束流传输系统,其中扩展布拉格峰(SOBP)中的剂量分布由一个脊形滤波器确定。剂量分布——进而滤波器的形状——根据临床情况选择,并相对于W(RBE)因子确定,以产生生物学等效的SOBP。SOBP中的W(RBE)因子首先从HSG细胞的RBE/传能线密度(LET)函数导出,然后在LET为80 keV/μm时归一化为3。后者的3值对应于NIRS中子的临床RBE,已发现其表现出与80 keV/μm碳离子相同的放射生物学特性。GSI拥有一个“动态”束流传输系统(“点”或“体素”扫描),使得能够照射不规则体积,并根据不同组织和/或不同子体积的放射敏感性调节辐射强度。由于该系统的“功能”及其导致的复杂性,W(RBE)因子通过一个综合计算代码确定,该代码允许物理和放射生物学参数进行迭代交互。为此目的开发了“局部效应模型”(LEM),旨在从确定对光子响应的参数中导出碳离子W(RBE)因子。将讨论各自方法的优缺点。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验