Rae Katherine, Orchard John
University of New South Wales, Australia.
Clin J Sport Med. 2007 May;17(3):201-4. doi: 10.1097/JSM.0b013e318059b536.
Injury classification systems are generally used in sports medicine (1) to accurately classify diagnoses for summary studies, permitting easy grouping into parent categories for tabulation and (2) to create a database from which cases can be extracted for research on specific injuries. Clarity is most important for the first purpose, whereas diagnostic detail is particularly important for the second. An ideal classification system is versatile and appropriate for all sports and all data collection scenarios. The Orchard Sports Injury Classification System (OSICS) was developed in 1992 primarily for the first purpose, a specific study examining the incidence of injury at the elite level of football in Australia. As usage of the OSICS expanded into different sports, limitations were noted and therefore many revisions have been made. A recent study found the OSICS-8, whilst superior to the International Classification of Diseases Australian Modification (ICD-10-AM) in both speed of use and 3-coder agreement, still achieved a lower level of agreement than expected. The study also revealed weaknesses in the OSICS-8 that needed to be addressed. A recent major revision resulted in the development of the new 4-character OSICS-10. This revision attempts to improve interuser agreement, partly by including more diagnoses encountered in a sports medicine setting. The OSICS-10 should provide far greater depth in classifications for the benefit of those looking to maintain diagnostic information. It is also structured to easily collapse down into parent classifications for those wanting to preserve basic information only. For those researchers wanting information collected under broader injury headings, particularly those not using fully computerized systems, the simplicity of the OSICS-8 system may still suffice.
一是为总结性研究准确分类诊断结果,以便轻松归为主要类别进行列表;二是创建一个数据库,从中提取病例用于特定损伤的研究。对于第一个用途,清晰性最为重要,而对于第二个用途,诊断细节尤为重要。理想的分类系统应具有通用性,适用于所有运动和所有数据收集场景。果园运动损伤分类系统(OSICS)于1992年开发,主要用于第一个目的,即一项关于澳大利亚足球精英层面损伤发生率的特定研究。随着OSICS在不同运动中的应用范围扩大,人们注意到了其局限性,因此进行了多次修订。最近一项研究发现,OSICS - 8虽然在使用速度和三位编码员一致性方面优于《澳大利亚疾病分类修订版》(ICD - 10 - AM),但其一致性水平仍低于预期。该研究还揭示了OSICS - 8中需要解决的弱点。最近的一次重大修订导致了新的四位字符的OSICS - 10的开发。这次修订试图提高用户间的一致性,部分原因是纳入了运动医学环境中遇到的更多诊断结果。OSICS - 10应能在分类上提供更深入的内容,以造福那些希望保留诊断信息的人。它的结构还便于为那些只想保留基本信息的人轻松归纳为主要分类。对于那些希望在更宽泛的损伤标题下收集信息的研究人员,特别是那些未使用完全计算机化系统的研究人员,OSICS - 8系统的简单性可能仍然足够。