Crossway Ashley K, Games Kenneth E, Eberman Lindsey E, Fleming Neil
Department of Applied Medicine and Rehabilitation, Indiana State University, Terre Haute, IN, USA.
Department of Kinesiology, Recreation, and Sport, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland.
Int J Exerc Sci. 2017 Mar 1;10(2):284-293. doi: 10.70252/NEWP3625. eCollection 2017.
The purpose of this study was to establish the level of ease of use and effectiveness of the Orchard Sport Injury Classification System (OSICS) 10.1 Plus for recording injuries and interventions. Three hundred and forty-two (males=148, females=192, no response=2; age=30.9±9.5y; experience=9.1±10.5y) athletic trainers (ATs) in the United States completed the survey. Participants were primarily employed in the secondary school (n=135) or collegiate setting (n=171). Participants entered system includes the OSICS 10.1 to catalog injuries and Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes to document interventions. Participants completed an 18-item end-user evaluation to assess the ease of use and effectiveness of the OSICS 10.1 Plus (5-point Likert scale). Participants indicated that the OSICS 10.1 Plus is overall easy to use (4.1±0.7pts), easy to enter an injury (4.1±0.8pts), and easy to enter the associated interventions (3.9±0.8pts). Respondents were neutral about whether the OSICS 10.1 Plus matched their current injury (3.5±1.0pts) or intervention (3.5±0.9pts) records. A majority of participants indicated that they could find the injury (281/342, 82.2%) and interventions (225/342, 65.8%) of interest. A majority of respondents (205/342, 60.0%) indicated they would consider using OSICS 10.1 Plus for injury surveillance in clinical practice. The OSICS 10.1 Plus could serve as an effective and useful mechanism for injury surveillance with minor modifications; however, we, as professionals in sports healthcare, need to improve regular medical documentation first so that we are better able to conduct injury surveillance among our patients.
本研究的目的是确定果园运动损伤分类系统（OSICS）10.1 Plus在记录损伤和干预措施方面的易用性水平和有效性。美国342名（男性=148名，女性=192名，无回应=2名；年龄=30.9±9.5岁；经验=9.1±10.5年）运动训练师（AT）完成了该调查。参与者主要受雇于中学（n=135）或大学环境（n=171）。参与者输入系统包括用于对损伤进行编目的OSICS 10.1和用于记录干预措施的现行程序术语（CPT）代码。参与者完成了一项18项的最终用户评估，以评估OSICS 10.1 Plus的易用性和有效性（5点李克特量表）。参与者表示，OSICS 10.1 Plus总体上易于使用（4.1±0.7分），易于输入损伤信息（4.1±0.8分），且易于输入相关干预措施（3.9±0.8分）。对于OSICS 10.1 Plus是否与他们当前的损伤（3.5±1.0分）或干预措施（3.5±0.9分）记录相匹配，受访者持中立态度。大多数参与者表示他们能够找到感兴趣的损伤（281/342，82.2%）和干预措施（225/342，65.8%）。大多数受访者（205/342，60.0%）表示他们会考虑在临床实践中使用OSICS 10.1 Plus进行损伤监测。OSICS 10.1 Plus稍作修改后可作为损伤监测的有效且有用的机制；然而，作为运动医疗保健专业人员，我们首先需要改进常规医疗记录，以便能够更好地对患者进行损伤监测。
