• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者对参与与艾滋病毒患者治疗结果相关的健康决策的偏好如何?

Is patients' preferred involvement in health decisions related to outcomes for patients with HIV?

作者信息

Beach Mary Catherine, Duggan Patrick S, Moore Richard D

机构信息

Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 2024 East Monument Street, Suite 2-500, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2007 Aug;22(8):1119-24. doi: 10.1007/s11606-007-0241-1. Epub 2007 May 19.

DOI:10.1007/s11606-007-0241-1
PMID:17514382
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2305727/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Previous studies suggest that patients who are more involved in their medical care have better outcomes.

OBJECTIVES

We sought to compare health care processes and outcomes for patients with HIV based on their preferred level of involvement in health decisions.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional analysis of audio computer-assisted interviews with patients at an urban HIV clinic.

PATIENTS

One thousand and twenty-seven patients awaiting an appointment with their primary care provider.

MEASURES

Patients were asked how they preferred to be involved in decisions (doctor makes most or all decisions, doctor and patient share decisions, patient makes all decisions). We also asked patients to rate the quality of communication with their HIV provider, and their self-reported receipt of and adherence to HAART.

RESULTS

Overall, 23% patients preferred that their doctor make all or most decisions, 63% preferred to share decisions with their doctor, and 13% preferred to make all final decisions alone. Compared to patients who prefer to share decisions with their HIV provider, patients who prefer that their provider make all/most decisions were significantly less likely to adhere to HAART (OR [odds ratio] 0.57, 95% CI 0.38-0.86) and patients who preferred to make decisions alone were significantly less likely to receive HAART or to have undetectable HIV RNA in unadjusted analyses (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.31-0.87 for receipt of HAART; OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.44-0.95 for undetectable HIV RNA). After controlling for potentially confounding patient characteristics and differences in patient ratings of communication quality, patients who preferred that their provider make all/most decisions remained significantly less likely to adhere to HAART (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.38-0.89); however, the associations with receipt of HAART and undetectable HIV RNA were no longer significant (OR 0.60, 95% CI 0.34-1.05 for receipt of HAART; OR 0.80, 95% C.I 0.53-1.20 for undetectable HIV RNA).

CONCLUSIONS

Although previous research suggests that more patient involvement in health care decisions is better, this benefit may be reduced when the patient wants to make decisions alone. Future research should explore the extent to which this preference is modifiable so as to improve outcomes.

摘要

背景

先前的研究表明,更多参与医疗护理的患者会有更好的治疗结果。

目的

我们试图根据患者在健康决策中偏好的参与程度,比较艾滋病病毒(HIV)患者的医疗保健过程和结果。

设计

对一家城市HIV诊所的患者进行音频计算机辅助访谈的横断面分析。

患者

1027名等待预约初级保健提供者的患者。

测量方法

询问患者他们希望如何参与决策(医生做出大多数或所有决策、医生和患者共同做出决策、患者做出所有决策)。我们还询问患者对与HIV提供者沟通质量的评分,以及他们自我报告的高效抗逆转录病毒治疗(HAART)的接受情况和依从性。

结果

总体而言,23%的患者希望医生做出所有或大多数决策,63%的患者希望与医生共同做出决策,13%的患者希望独自做出所有最终决策。与倾向于与HIV提供者共同做出决策的患者相比,倾向于让提供者做出所有/大多数决策的患者坚持HAART的可能性显著降低(比值比[OR]0.57,95%置信区间[CI]0.38 - 0.86),在未经调整的分析中,倾向于独自做出决策的患者接受HAART或HIV RNA检测不到的可能性显著降低(接受HAART的OR为0.52,95%CI为0.31 - 0.87;HIV RNA检测不到的OR为0.64,95%CI为0.44 - 0.95)。在控制了潜在的混杂患者特征和患者沟通质量评分的差异后,倾向于让提供者做出所有/大多数决策的患者坚持HAART的可能性仍然显著降低(OR 0.58,95%CI 0.38 - 0.89);然而,与接受HAART和HIV RNA检测不到的关联不再显著(接受HAART的OR为0.60,95%CI为0.34 - 1.05;HIV RNA检测不到的OR为0.80,95%CI为0.53 - 1.20)。

结论

尽管先前的研究表明患者更多地参与医疗保健决策更好,但当患者希望独自做出决策时,这种益处可能会降低。未来的研究应该探索这种偏好可改变的程度,以改善治疗结果。

相似文献

1
Is patients' preferred involvement in health decisions related to outcomes for patients with HIV?患者对参与与艾滋病毒患者治疗结果相关的健康决策的偏好如何?
J Gen Intern Med. 2007 Aug;22(8):1119-24. doi: 10.1007/s11606-007-0241-1. Epub 2007 May 19.
2
Decision-making role preferences among patients with HIV: associations with patient and provider characteristics and communication behaviors.HIV患者的决策角色偏好:与患者及医疗服务提供者特征和沟通行为的关联
J Gen Intern Med. 2010 Jun;25(6):517-23. doi: 10.1007/s11606-010-1275-3. Epub 2010 Feb 24.
3
Is the quality of the patient-provider relationship associated with better adherence and health outcomes for patients with HIV?患者与医疗服务提供者之间的关系质量是否与HIV患者更好的依从性及健康结果相关?
J Gen Intern Med. 2006 Jun;21(6):661-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00399.x.
4
The decision to forgo antiretroviral therapy in people living with HIV compliance as paternalism or partnership?在艾滋病毒感染者中放弃抗逆转录病毒治疗的决定:是家长式做法还是伙伴关系?
Eur J Med Res. 2004 Feb 27;9(2):61-70.
5
Association of Actual and Preferred Decision Roles With Patient-Reported Quality of Care: Shared Decision Making in Cancer Care.实际和期望的决策角色与患者报告的护理质量的关联:癌症护理中的共同决策。
JAMA Oncol. 2015 Apr;1(1):50-8. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2014.112.
6
Physicians' participatory decision-making and quality of diabetes care processes and outcomes: results from the triad study.医生的参与式决策与糖尿病护理过程及结果的质量:三联研究结果
Chronic Illn. 2009 Sep;5(3):165-76. doi: 10.1177/1742395309339258. Epub 2009 Aug 12.
7
Intention to adhere to HIV treatment: a patient-centred predictor of antiretroviral adherence.坚持接受 HIV 治疗的意愿:影响抗逆转录病毒治疗依从性的以患者为中心的预测指标。
HIV Med. 2013 Sep;14(8):472-80. doi: 10.1111/hiv.12032. Epub 2013 Apr 3.
8
Supporting adherence to highly active antiretroviral therapy and protected sex among people living with HIV/AIDS: the role of patient-provider communication in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.支持艾滋病毒/艾滋病感染者坚持高效抗逆转录病毒治疗并采取安全性行为:巴西里约热内卢患者与医护人员沟通的作用。
AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2006 Sep;20(9):637-48. doi: 10.1089/apc.2006.20.637.
9
Patients' preferences regarding the timing of highly active antiretroviral therapy initiation for chronic asymptomatic HIV-1 infection.慢性无症状HIV-1感染患者对于开始高效抗逆转录病毒治疗时机的偏好。
Antivir Ther. 2006;11(3):335-41.
10
Why do some patients prefer to leave decisions up to the doctor: lack of self-efficacy or a matter of trust?为什么有些患者更愿意将决策交给医生:是缺乏自我效能感还是信任问题?
J Cancer Surviv. 2013 Dec;7(4):592-601. doi: 10.1007/s11764-013-0298-2. Epub 2013 Jul 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Using an automated decision support tool to improve HIV prescribing: A feasibility study.使用自动化决策支持工具改善艾滋病病毒治疗处方:一项可行性研究。
HIV Med. 2025 Jun;26(6):914-922. doi: 10.1111/hiv.70028. Epub 2025 Apr 24.
2
Acceptability of long-acting antiretroviral therapy among people living with HIV who use drugs in Vancouver, Canada: A qualitative study.加拿大温哥华使用毒品的艾滋病毒感染者对长效抗逆转录病毒疗法的可接受性:一项定性研究。
PLoS One. 2025 Feb 28;20(2):e0319010. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0319010. eCollection 2025.
3
A Qualitative Study of Black and Latine HIV Care Consumers' Perceptions of Providers' Behaviors, Medical Mistrust, and Experiences of Discrimination.一项关于黑人和拉丁裔 HIV 护理消费者对提供者行为、医疗不信任和歧视经历看法的定性研究。
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2024;35(4):1206-1228. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2024.a943986.
4
Color-Blind and Multicultural Strategies in Medical Settings.医疗环境中的色盲与多元文化策略。
Soc Issues Policy Rev. 2017 Jan;11(1):124-158. doi: 10.1111/sipr.12029. Epub 2017 Jan 13.
5
Barriers and Facilitators for Implementing Shared Decision Making in Differentiated Antiretroviral Therapy Service in Northwest Ethiopia: Implications for Policy and Practice.埃塞俄比亚西北部差异化抗逆转录病毒治疗服务中实施共同决策的障碍与促进因素:对政策和实践的启示
MDM Policy Pract. 2024 Sep 18;9(2):23814683241281385. doi: 10.1177/23814683241281385. eCollection 2024 Jul-Dec.
6
How Patient-Generated Data Enhance Patient-Provider Communication in Chronic Care: Field Study in Design Science Research.患者生成的数据如何增强慢性病护理中的医患沟通:设计科学研究中的实地研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2024 Sep 10;12:e57406. doi: 10.2196/57406.
7
Patient reported experience measures on HIV viral load testing at public health facilities in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania: A convergent mixed method study.坦桑尼亚达累斯萨拉姆公共卫生设施中患者报告的艾滋病毒病毒载量检测体验指标:一项聚合性混合方法研究
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023 Apr 7;3(4):e0001024. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001024. eCollection 2023.
8
Prosthesis preferences for those with upper limb loss: Discrete choice study of PULLTY® for use in regulatory decisions.上肢缺失者的假肢偏好:用于监管决策的PULLTY®离散选择研究
J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng. 2023 Jan 20;10:20556683231152418. doi: 10.1177/20556683231152418. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
9
An Intervention by and for Transgender Women Living With HIV: Study Protocol for a Two-Arm Randomized Controlled Trial Testing the Efficacy of " to Improve HIV Care Outcomes.一项针对感染艾滋病毒的跨性别女性并由其参与的干预措施:一项双臂随机对照试验的研究方案,该试验旨在测试“改善艾滋病毒护理结果”的有效性。
Front Reprod Health. 2021 Oct 27;3:665723. doi: 10.3389/frph.2021.665723. eCollection 2021.
10
Understanding PrEP decision making among pregnant women in Lilongwe, Malawi: A mixed-methods study.理解马拉维利隆圭孕妇的 PrEP 决策:一项混合方法研究。
J Int AIDS Soc. 2022 Sep;25(9):e26007. doi: 10.1002/jia2.26007.

本文引用的文献

1
Is the quality of the patient-provider relationship associated with better adherence and health outcomes for patients with HIV?患者与医疗服务提供者之间的关系质量是否与HIV患者更好的依从性及健康结果相关?
J Gen Intern Med. 2006 Jun;21(6):661-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00399.x.
2
Patients' preference for involvement in medical decision making: a narrative review.患者参与医疗决策的偏好:一项叙述性综述。
Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Feb;60(2):102-14. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.02.003.
3
Do patients treated with dignity report higher satisfaction, adherence, and receipt of preventive care?接受有尊严治疗的患者是否报告更高的满意度、依从性和预防性护理的接受度?
Ann Fam Med. 2005 Jul-Aug;3(4):331-8. doi: 10.1370/afm.328.
4
Stability of decisional role preference over the course of cancer therapy.癌症治疗过程中决策角色偏好的稳定性。
Psychooncology. 2006 Apr;15(4):297-305. doi: 10.1002/pon.954.
5
Do patients benefit from participating in medical decision making? Longitudinal follow-up of women with breast cancer.患者参与医疗决策会从中受益吗?对乳腺癌女性患者的纵向随访。
Psychooncology. 2006 Jan;15(1):9-19. doi: 10.1002/pon.907.
6
Screening for depression in clinical practice: reliability and validity of a five-item subset of the CES-Depression.
Percept Mot Skills. 2003 Dec;97(3 Pt 1):855-61. doi: 10.2466/pms.2003.97.3.855.
7
Effect of a self-management program on patients with chronic disease.自我管理项目对慢性病患者的影响。
Eff Clin Pract. 2001 Nov-Dec;4(6):256-62.
8
Sharing decisions in cancer care.癌症护理中的共同决策。
Soc Sci Med. 2001 Jun;52(12):1865-78. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(00)00303-8.
9
Chronic care clinics for diabetes in primary care: a system-wide randomized trial.基层医疗中糖尿病慢性护理诊所:一项全系统随机试验。
Diabetes Care. 2001 Apr;24(4):695-700. doi: 10.2337/diacare.24.4.695.
10
Self-reported adherence to antiretroviral medications among participants in HIV clinical trials: the AACTG adherence instruments. Patient Care Committee & Adherence Working Group of the Outcomes Committee of the Adult AIDS Clinical Trials Group (AACTG).艾滋病临床试验参与者中自我报告的抗逆转录病毒药物依从性:成人艾滋病临床试验组(AACTG)依从性工具。成人艾滋病临床试验组(AACTG)结果委员会患者护理委员会及依从性工作组
AIDS Care. 2000 Jun;12(3):255-66. doi: 10.1080/09540120050042891.