Ludwig Ira, Pieper Wolfgang, Lachnit Harald
Faculty of Psychology, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Percept Psychophys. 2007 Jan;69(1):92-102. doi: 10.3758/bf03194456.
We evaluated stereopsis and binocular luster using electronically controlled shutter glasses with alternating monocular stimulation. In Experiment 1, we used the standard method for testing stereoacuity to obtain a gradual measure of stereopsis. Stereo thresholds decreased with increasing alternating frequency of two monocular half-images without a delay between them. Increasing delays led to increasing thresholds. In Experiment 2, we compared stereopsis resulting from two monocular half-images of a random-dot stereogram and binocular luster with respect to the minimum alternating frequency of the two half-images and the maximum interocular delay that were tolerated without a breakdown of the impression. Below 3 Hz, no stereopsis occurred. Binocular luster was observed only above 10 Hz. The mean threshold of interocular delay for detecting the global figure in a random-dot stereogram was about 51 msec, but for binocular luster it was about 20 msec. Overall, temporal integration was better for stereopsis than for binocular luster.
我们使用带有交替单眼刺激的电控快门眼镜评估了立体视和双眼光泽度。在实验1中,我们采用测试立体视锐度的标准方法来逐步测量立体视。随着两个单眼半图像交替频率的增加,立体视阈值降低,且两者之间无延迟。延迟增加导致阈值升高。在实验2中,我们比较了随机点立体图的两个单眼半图像产生的立体视和双眼光泽度,涉及两个半图像的最小交替频率以及在印象不崩溃的情况下可容忍的最大眼间延迟。低于3赫兹时,未出现立体视。仅在高于10赫兹时观察到双眼光泽度。在随机点立体图中检测整体图形的眼间延迟平均阈值约为51毫秒,但双眼光泽度的平均阈值约为20毫秒。总体而言,立体视的时间整合比双眼光泽度更好。