• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

距离产生美:人类(智人)与伴侣分离的时间比例、男性性心理和精子竞争

Absence makes the adaptations grow fonder: proportion of time apart from partner, male sexual psychology, and sperm competition in humans (Homo sapiens).

作者信息

Shackelford Todd K, Goetz Aaron T, McKibbin William F, Starratt Valerie G

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Florida Atlantic University, Davie, FL 33314, USA.

出版信息

J Comp Psychol. 2007 May;121(2):214-20. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.121.2.214.

DOI:10.1037/0735-7036.121.2.214
PMID:17516800
Abstract

Sperm competition occurs when the sperm of multiple males concurrently occupy the reproductive tract of a female and compete to fertilize an egg. We used a questionnaire to investigate psychological responses to the risk of sperm competition for 237 men in committed, sexual relationships. As predicted, a man who spends a greater (relative to a man who spends a lesser) proportion of time apart from his partner since the couple's last copulation reported (a) greater sexual interest in his partner, (b) greater distress in response to his partner's sexual rejection, and (c) greater sexual persistence in response to his partner's sexual rejection. All effects were independent of total time since the couple's last copulation and the man's relationship satisfaction. Discussion addresses limitations of the current research and situates the current results within the broader comparative literature on adaptation to sperm competition.

摘要

当多个雄性的精子同时占据雌性的生殖道并竞争使卵子受精时,就会发生精子竞争。我们通过问卷调查,对237名处于稳定恋爱关系且有性行为的男性对精子竞争风险的心理反应进行了调查。正如所预测的那样,自夫妻上次交配以来,与伴侣分开时间比例更大(相对于分开时间比例较小的男性)的男性报告称:(a)对伴侣有更大的性兴趣;(b)对伴侣的性拒绝反应更痛苦;(c)对伴侣的性拒绝反应有更强的性坚持。所有影响均独立于夫妻上次交配后的总时间以及男性的关系满意度。讨论部分阐述了当前研究的局限性,并将当前结果置于关于适应精子竞争的更广泛比较文献之中。

相似文献

1
Absence makes the adaptations grow fonder: proportion of time apart from partner, male sexual psychology, and sperm competition in humans (Homo sapiens).距离产生美:人类(智人)与伴侣分离的时间比例、男性性心理和精子竞争
J Comp Psychol. 2007 May;121(2):214-20. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.121.2.214.
2
Perceived risk of female infidelity moderates the relationship between objective risk of female infidelity and sexual coercion in humans (Homo sapiens).人类(智人)中,对女性不忠的感知风险调节了女性不忠的客观风险与性胁迫之间的关系。
J Comp Psychol. 2011 Aug;125(3):370-3. doi: 10.1037/a0023146.
3
The relationship between objective sperm competition risk and men's copulatory interest is moderated by partner's time spent with other men.客观精子竞争风险与男性交配兴趣之间的关系受到伴侣与其他男性共度时间的调节。
Hum Nat. 2013 Dec;24(4):476-85. doi: 10.1007/s12110-013-9181-0.
4
Sexual coercion in intimate relationships: a comparative analysis of the effects of women's infidelity and men's dominance and control.亲密关系中的性胁迫:女性不忠以及男性主导与控制之影响的比较分析
Arch Sex Behav. 2009 Apr;38(2):226-34. doi: 10.1007/s10508-008-9353-x. Epub 2008 Apr 15.
5
Partner attractiveness moderates the relationship between number of sexual rivals and in-pair copulation frequency in humans (Homo sapiens).伴侣吸引力调节了人类(智人)中性竞争对手数量与配对内交配频率之间的关系。
J Comp Psychol. 2014 Aug;128(3):328-31. doi: 10.1037/a0036602.
6
Sexual coercion and forced in-pair copulation as sperm competition tactics in humans.性胁迫和强迫配对性交作为人类精子竞争策略
Hum Nat. 2006 Sep;17(3):265-82. doi: 10.1007/s12110-006-1009-8.
7
The sexual relationships of sexual-minority women partnered with trans men: a qualitative study.性少数女性与跨性别男性伴侣的性关系:一项定性研究。
Arch Sex Behav. 2010 Apr;39(2):561-72. doi: 10.1007/s10508-009-9511-9. Epub 2009 Jul 16.
8
Sexual insistence and disliked sexual activities in young adulthood: differences by gender and relationship characteristics.青年期的性强迫及令人反感的性行为:基于性别和关系特征的差异
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2009 Mar;41(1):33-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1931-2393.2009.4113309.x.
9
An integrative view of sexual selection in Tribolium flour beetles.赤拟谷盗性选择的综合观点。
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2008 May;83(2):151-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2008.00037.x.
10
Husband's Reaction to His Wife's Sexual Rejection Is Predicted by the Time She Spends With Her Male Friends but Not Her Male Coworkers.丈夫对妻子性拒绝的反应可由妻子与男性朋友相处的时间来预测,而与男性同事相处的时间则无法预测。
Evol Psychol. 2017 Apr-Jun;15(2):1474704917705062. doi: 10.1177/1474704917705062.

引用本文的文献

1
Sperm Competition Risk and Sexual Coercion Predict Copulatory Duration in Humans.精子竞争风险与性胁迫可预测人类的交配时长。
Evol Psychol. 2015 Dec 1;13(4):1474704915618411. doi: 10.1177/1474704915618411.
2
Do Men Produce Higher Quality Ejaculates When Primed With Thoughts of Partner Infidelity?当男性因伴侣不忠的想法而产生性唤起时,他们射出的精液质量会更高吗?
Evol Psychol. 2018 Jan-Mar;16(1):1474704918757551. doi: 10.1177/1474704918757551.
3
Husband's Reaction to His Wife's Sexual Rejection Is Predicted by the Time She Spends With Her Male Friends but Not Her Male Coworkers.
丈夫对妻子性拒绝的反应可由妻子与男性朋友相处的时间来预测,而与男性同事相处的时间则无法预测。
Evol Psychol. 2017 Apr-Jun;15(2):1474704917705062. doi: 10.1177/1474704917705062.
4
Sperm competition in humans: mate guarding behavior negatively correlates with ejaculate quality.人类的精子竞争:配偶守护行为与射精质量呈负相关。
PLoS One. 2014 Sep 24;9(9):e108099. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0108099. eCollection 2014.
5
Oral sex, semen displacement, and sexual arousal: testing the ejaculate adjustment hypothesis.口交、精液置换与性唤起:对射精调整假说的检验
Evol Psychol. 2013 Dec 20;11(5):1130-9. doi: 10.1177/147470491301100515.
6
The relationship between objective sperm competition risk and men's copulatory interest is moderated by partner's time spent with other men.客观精子竞争风险与男性交配兴趣之间的关系受到伴侣与其他男性共度时间的调节。
Hum Nat. 2013 Dec;24(4):476-85. doi: 10.1007/s12110-013-9181-0.
7
Is cunnilingus-assisted orgasm a male sperm-retention strategy?口交辅助达到性高潮是男性的一种精子保留策略吗?
Evol Psychol. 2013 Jun 6;11(2):405-14. doi: 10.1177/147470491301100210.
8
Infidelity, jealousy, and wife abuse among Tsimane forager-farmers: Testing evolutionary hypotheses of marital conflict.齐曼内觅食-农耕群体中的不忠、嫉妒与虐妻行为:对婚姻冲突进化假说的检验
Evol Hum Behav. 2012 Sep;33(5):438-448. doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2011.12.006.
9
Evolutionary psychology is compatible with equity feminism, but not with gender feminism: a reply to Eagly and Wood (2011).进化心理学与平等女权主义相容,但与性别女权主义不相容:对伊格利和伍德(2011年)的回应。
Evol Psychol. 2012 Jan 11;10(1):39-43. doi: 10.1177/147470491201000104.