Kelly Megan M, Forsyth John P
University at Albany, State University of New York, Albany, NY, USA.
Emotion. 2007 May;7(2):324-35. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.7.2.324.
Anxious persons show automatic and strategic attentional biases for threatening information. Yet, the mechanisms and processes that underlie such biases remain unclear. The central aim of the present study was to elucidate the relation between observational threat learning and the acquisition and extinction of biased threat processing by integrating emotional Stroop color naming tasks within an observational differential fear conditioning procedure. Forty-three healthy female participants underwent several consecutive observational fear conditioning phases. During acquisition, participants watched a confederate displaying mock panic attacks (UCS) paired with a verbal stimulus (CS+), but not with a second nonreinforced verbal stimulus (CS-). As expected, participants showed greater magnitude electrodermal and verbal-evaluative (e.g., distress, fear) conditioned responses to the CS+ over the CS- word. Participants also demonstrated slower color-naming latencies to CS+ compared to the CS- word following acquisition and showed attenuation of this preferential processing bias for threat following extinction. Findings are discussed broadly in the context of the interplay between fear learning and processing biases for threat as observed in persons suffering from anxiety disorders.
焦虑的人对威胁性信息表现出自动和策略性的注意偏向。然而,这种偏向背后的机制和过程仍不清楚。本研究的主要目的是通过在观察性差异恐惧条件反射程序中整合情绪Stroop颜色命名任务,阐明观察性威胁学习与偏向性威胁处理的获得和消退之间的关系。43名健康女性参与者经历了几个连续的观察性恐惧条件反射阶段。在习得阶段,参与者观看一名同盟者表现出模拟惊恐发作(无条件刺激),同时伴有言语刺激(条件刺激+),但不伴有第二种非强化言语刺激(条件刺激-)。正如预期的那样,与条件刺激-的词语相比,参与者对条件刺激+表现出更大程度的皮肤电反应和言语评价性(如痛苦、恐惧)条件反应。在习得后,与条件刺激-的词语相比,参与者对条件刺激+的颜色命名潜伏期也更长,并且在消退后,这种对威胁的优先处理偏向有所减弱。研究结果在焦虑症患者中观察到的恐惧学习与威胁处理偏向之间的相互作用的背景下进行了广泛讨论。