Wainstein B K, Kashef S, Ziegler M, Jelley D, Ziegler J B
Department of Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Sydney Children's Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Clin Exp Allergy. 2007 Jun;37(6):839-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2007.02726.x.
Parents of atopic children frequently report, and are alarmed by, contact reactions to foods. Some schools restrict foods due to concerns regarding possible systemic reactions following contact in allergic children.
We aimed to determine the frequency with which peanut-sensitive children exhibited contact sensitivity to peanut butter and to assess the significance of such reactions.
One gram of peanut butter was applied directly to the skin of 281 children who were skin prick test (SPT) positive to peanut (immediate skin application food test; I-SAFT). The test was considered positive if one or more weals were present when the patch was removed after 15 min. A subset of children then underwent an open-label oral challenge with graded amounts of peanut protein.
During 3515 clinic visits, 330 I-SAFT tests for peanut contact sensitivity were performed; 136 (41%) were positive. The mean SPT diameter was 10 mm in the I-SAFT-positive children and 8.5 mm in the I-SAFT-negative children (t-test, P<0.0001). No child had a systemic reaction following topical application of peanut butter. Eighty-four children had 85 oral challenges after blinded, placebo-controlled I-SAFT testing. Challenge was positive in 26/32 of those with a positive I-SAFT and negative in only 6/32. Challenge was also positive in 26/53 but negative in 27/53 of those with a negative I-SAFT (sensitivity 50%, specificity 82%, chi2, P=0.003).
A minority of children sensitized to peanut (positive SPT) develop localized urticaria from prolonged skin contact with peanut butter. No tested subjects, including ones with systemic reactions upon oral challenge, developed a systemic reaction to prolonged skin exposure to peanut. Therefore, systemic reactions resulting from this mode of contact with peanut butter appear highly unlikely.
特应性儿童的父母经常报告对食物的接触反应,并对此感到担忧。一些学校因担心过敏儿童接触食物后可能出现全身反应而限制某些食物。
我们旨在确定对花生敏感的儿童对花生酱表现出接触敏感性的频率,并评估此类反应的意义。
将1克花生酱直接涂抹在281名花生皮肤点刺试验(SPT)呈阳性的儿童皮肤上(即时皮肤应用食物试验;I-SAFT)。如果在15分钟后取下贴片时出现一个或多个风团,则该试验被视为阳性。然后,一部分儿童接受了不同剂量花生蛋白的开放标签口服激发试验。
在3515次门诊就诊期间,进行了330次花生接触敏感性的I-SAFT试验;136次(41%)呈阳性。I-SAFT阳性儿童的平均SPT直径为10毫米,I-SAFT阴性儿童为8.5毫米(t检验,P<0.0001)。局部涂抹花生酱后,没有儿童出现全身反应。84名儿童在进行盲法、安慰剂对照的I-SAFT试验后进行了85次口服激发试验。I-SAFT阳性的儿童中,26/32激发试验呈阳性,只有6/32呈阴性。I-SAFT阴性的儿童中,26/53激发试验呈阳性,但27/53呈阴性(敏感性50%,特异性82%,卡方检验,P=0.003)。
少数对花生敏感(SPT阳性)的儿童因长时间皮肤接触花生酱而出现局部荨麻疹。包括口服激发试验时有全身反应的受试者在内,没有受试对象因长时间皮肤接触花生而出现全身反应。因此,通过这种方式接触花生酱导致全身反应的可能性似乎极小。