• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

花生敏感儿童对花生的即刻接触反应的频率及意义

Frequency and significance of immediate contact reactions to peanut in peanut-sensitive children.

作者信息

Wainstein B K, Kashef S, Ziegler M, Jelley D, Ziegler J B

机构信息

Department of Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Sydney Children's Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Clin Exp Allergy. 2007 Jun;37(6):839-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2007.02726.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2222.2007.02726.x
PMID:17517097
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Parents of atopic children frequently report, and are alarmed by, contact reactions to foods. Some schools restrict foods due to concerns regarding possible systemic reactions following contact in allergic children.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to determine the frequency with which peanut-sensitive children exhibited contact sensitivity to peanut butter and to assess the significance of such reactions.

METHODS

One gram of peanut butter was applied directly to the skin of 281 children who were skin prick test (SPT) positive to peanut (immediate skin application food test; I-SAFT). The test was considered positive if one or more weals were present when the patch was removed after 15 min. A subset of children then underwent an open-label oral challenge with graded amounts of peanut protein.

RESULTS

During 3515 clinic visits, 330 I-SAFT tests for peanut contact sensitivity were performed; 136 (41%) were positive. The mean SPT diameter was 10 mm in the I-SAFT-positive children and 8.5 mm in the I-SAFT-negative children (t-test, P<0.0001). No child had a systemic reaction following topical application of peanut butter. Eighty-four children had 85 oral challenges after blinded, placebo-controlled I-SAFT testing. Challenge was positive in 26/32 of those with a positive I-SAFT and negative in only 6/32. Challenge was also positive in 26/53 but negative in 27/53 of those with a negative I-SAFT (sensitivity 50%, specificity 82%, chi2, P=0.003).

CONCLUSION

A minority of children sensitized to peanut (positive SPT) develop localized urticaria from prolonged skin contact with peanut butter. No tested subjects, including ones with systemic reactions upon oral challenge, developed a systemic reaction to prolonged skin exposure to peanut. Therefore, systemic reactions resulting from this mode of contact with peanut butter appear highly unlikely.

摘要

背景

特应性儿童的父母经常报告对食物的接触反应,并对此感到担忧。一些学校因担心过敏儿童接触食物后可能出现全身反应而限制某些食物。

目的

我们旨在确定对花生敏感的儿童对花生酱表现出接触敏感性的频率,并评估此类反应的意义。

方法

将1克花生酱直接涂抹在281名花生皮肤点刺试验(SPT)呈阳性的儿童皮肤上(即时皮肤应用食物试验;I-SAFT)。如果在15分钟后取下贴片时出现一个或多个风团,则该试验被视为阳性。然后,一部分儿童接受了不同剂量花生蛋白的开放标签口服激发试验。

结果

在3515次门诊就诊期间,进行了330次花生接触敏感性的I-SAFT试验;136次(41%)呈阳性。I-SAFT阳性儿童的平均SPT直径为10毫米,I-SAFT阴性儿童为8.5毫米(t检验,P<0.0001)。局部涂抹花生酱后,没有儿童出现全身反应。84名儿童在进行盲法、安慰剂对照的I-SAFT试验后进行了85次口服激发试验。I-SAFT阳性的儿童中,26/32激发试验呈阳性,只有6/32呈阴性。I-SAFT阴性的儿童中,26/53激发试验呈阳性,但27/53呈阴性(敏感性50%,特异性82%,卡方检验,P=0.003)。

结论

少数对花生敏感(SPT阳性)的儿童因长时间皮肤接触花生酱而出现局部荨麻疹。包括口服激发试验时有全身反应的受试者在内,没有受试对象因长时间皮肤接触花生而出现全身反应。因此,通过这种方式接触花生酱导致全身反应的可能性似乎极小。

相似文献

1
Frequency and significance of immediate contact reactions to peanut in peanut-sensitive children.花生敏感儿童对花生的即刻接触反应的频率及意义
Clin Exp Allergy. 2007 Jun;37(6):839-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2007.02726.x.
2
Combining skin prick, immediate skin application and specific-IgE testing in the diagnosis of peanut allergy in children.联合皮肤点刺、即时皮肤涂抹及特异性IgE检测用于儿童花生过敏的诊断
Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2007 May;18(3):231-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3038.2007.00517.x.
3
Delayed- and immediate-type reactions in the atopy patch test with food allergens in young children with atopic dermatitis.特应性皮炎幼儿食物过敏原斑贴试验中的迟发型和速发型反应
Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2009 Feb;20(1):53-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3038.2008.00760.x. Epub 2008 Jun 24.
4
Prediction of anaphylaxis during peanut food challenge: usefulness of the peanut skin prick test (SPT) and specific IgE level.花生食物激发试验中过敏反应的预测:花生皮点刺试验(SPT)和特异性 IgE 水平的作用。
Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2010 Jun;21(4 Pt 1):603-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3038.2010.01063.x. Epub 2010 Apr 27.
5
Allergy or tolerance in children sensitized to peanut: prevalence and differentiation using component-resolved diagnostics.儿童花生过敏或耐受:使用成分分辨诊断进行的患病率和区分。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010 Jan;125(1):191-7.e1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2009.10.008.
6
Skin prick testing predicts peanut challenge outcome in previously allergic or sensitized children with low serum peanut-specific IgE antibody concentration.皮肤点刺试验可预测血清花生特异性IgE抗体浓度较低的既往过敏或致敏儿童的花生激发试验结果。
Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2007 May;18(3):224-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3038.2007.00519.x.
7
Skin prick testing and peanut-specific IgE can predict peanut challenge outcomes in preschoolchildren with peanut sensitization.皮肤点刺试验和花生特异性 IgE 可预测花生致敏的学龄前儿童花生挑战结果。
Clin Exp Allergy. 2011 Jul;41(7):994-1000. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2011.03717.x. Epub 2011 Mar 24.
8
Predictive value of skin prick tests using recombinant allergens for diagnosis of peanut allergy.使用重组变应原进行皮肤点刺试验对花生过敏诊断的预测价值。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2006 Jul;118(1):250-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2006.04.053.
9
Does severity of low-dose, double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenges reflect severity of allergic reactions to peanut in the community?低剂量、双盲、安慰剂对照食物激发试验的严重程度是否反映了社区中对花生过敏反应的严重程度?
Clin Exp Allergy. 2005 Sep;35(9):1227-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2005.02312.x.
10
Epicutaneous exposure to peanut protein prevents oral tolerance and enhances allergic sensitization.经皮暴露于花生蛋白会阻止口服耐受并增强过敏致敏。
Clin Exp Allergy. 2005 Jun;35(6):757-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2005.02260.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Addressing Anxiety and Depression in the Allergy Clinic Through Motivational Interviewing, Brief Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, and Curious Questions.通过动机性访谈、简短认知行为疗法和好奇提问来解决过敏诊所中的焦虑和抑郁问题。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2025 May 16. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2025.05.020.
2
Food Allergy Care: "It Takes a Team".食物过敏护理:“需要团队协作”。
Mo Med. 2016 Jul-Aug;113(4):314-319.
3
Clinical Management of Food Allergy.食物过敏的临床管理
Pediatr Clin North Am. 2015 Dec;62(6):1409-24. doi: 10.1016/j.pcl.2015.07.012. Epub 2015 Sep 7.
4
Managing food allergies in schools.管理学校中的食物过敏。
Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2014 Oct;14(10):467. doi: 10.1007/s11882-014-0467-z.
5
Food allergy: diagnosis, management & emerging therapies.食物过敏:诊断、管理与新兴疗法。
Indian J Med Res. 2014 Jun;139(6):805-13.
6
Food allergens in mattress dust in Norwegian homes - a potentially important source of allergen exposure.挪威家庭床垫灰尘中的食物过敏原——过敏原暴露的一个潜在重要来源。
Clin Exp Allergy. 2014 Jan;44(1):142-9. doi: 10.1111/cea.12231.
7
Filaggrin gene mutation associations with peanut allergy persist despite variations in peanut allergy diagnostic criteria or asthma status.尽管花生过敏诊断标准或哮喘状态存在差异,但丝聚合蛋白基因突变与花生过敏之间的关联依然存在。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013 Jul;132(1):239-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2013.03.043. Epub 2013 May 16.