• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Will first-responders show up for work during a pandemic? Lessons from a smallpox vaccination survey of paramedics.急救人员会在大流行期间出勤工作吗?来自护理人员天花疫苗接种调查的经验教训。
Disaster Manag Response. 2007 Apr-Jun;5(2):45-8. doi: 10.1016/j.dmr.2007.02.002.
2
US disaster planners' attitudes regarding preevent vaccine for first responders and point-of-dispensing workers.美国灾难规划者对一线救援人员和分发点工作人员进行预先事件疫苗接种的态度。
Health Secur. 2015 Jan-Feb;13(1):29-36. doi: 10.1089/hs.2014.0066. Epub 2015 Jan 28.
3
Planning for pandemic influenza.大流行性流感的规划
Nurs Stand. 2007;22(3):35-9. doi: 10.7748/ns2007.09.22.3.35.c4634.
4
Epidemiology. Controlling smallpox.流行病学。控制天花。
Science. 2002 Nov 15;298(5597):1342-4. doi: 10.1126/science.1079370.
5
Avian flu: pandemic preparedness.禽流感:大流行防范
Home Healthc Nurse. 2007 Nov-Dec;25(10):637-42; quiz 643-4. doi: 10.1097/01.NHH.0000298932.22846.36.
6
Healthcare workers who elected not to receive smallpox vaccination.选择不接种天花疫苗的医护人员。
Am J Prev Med. 2006 Mar;30(3):258-65. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2005.10.005.
7
A crisis: fear toward a possible H5N1 pandemic.一场危机:对可能出现的H5N1大流行的恐惧。
J Nurs Care Qual. 2008 Apr-Jun;23(2):177-83. doi: 10.1097/01.NCQ.0000313768.17514.a3.
8
South Carolina prepares: pandemic influenza.南卡罗来纳州做好准备:应对大流行性流感。
S C Nurse (1994). 2006 Apr-Jun;13(2):22.
9
[Risk of smallpox, vaccination, bioterrorism].[天花风险、疫苗接种、生物恐怖主义]
Presse Med. 2005 Jan 29;34(2 Pt 2):177-184. doi: 10.1016/s0755-4982(05)83899-0.
10
Avian influenza: are you prepared?禽流感:你准备好了吗?
Nurs Stand. 2006;21(5):51-6; quiz 58. doi: 10.7748/ns2006.10.21.5.51.c6372.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of occupational exposure to COVID-19 on the physical and mental health of an essential workgroup: New York City transit workers.职业暴露于新冠病毒对一个重要工作群体身心健康的影响:纽约市公交员工
J Emerg Manag. 2021 Jul 1;19(9):133-146. doi: 10.5055/jem.0599.
2
Emergency medical service interventions and experiences during pandemics: A scoping review.大流行期间的紧急医疗服务干预措施与经验:一项范围综述
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 1;19(8):e0304672. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304672. eCollection 2024.
3
Assessment of Physicians' Willingness to Work with Patients Not Yet Diagnosed with COVID-19 in a Romanian Sample.罗马尼亚样本中医生与尚未确诊为COVID-19患者合作意愿的评估。
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Jan 10;12(2):161. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12020161.
4
Navigating a Pandemic: Leadership Dynamics and Challenges within Infection Prevention and Control Units in Israel.应对大流行:以色列感染预防与控制部门的领导动态与挑战
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Nov 15;11(22):2966. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11222966.
5
Are the healthcare providers willing and able to respond to disasters: An assessment of tertiary health care system of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa.医疗服务提供者是否愿意并有能力应对灾害:对开伯尔-普赫图赫瓦省三级医疗保健系统的评估。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 3;18(11):e0293720. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293720. eCollection 2023.
6
Physicians' Trust in Relevant Institutions during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Binary Logistic Model.COVID-19大流行期间医生对相关机构的信任:二元逻辑模型
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jun 13;11(12):1736. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11121736.
7
Synthesis of Evidence to Support EMS Personnel's Mental Health During Disease Outbreaks: A Scoping Review.支持疾病爆发期间急救医疗服务人员心理健康的证据综合:一项范围综述
Saf Health Work. 2022 Dec;13(4):379-386. doi: 10.1016/j.shaw.2022.08.006. Epub 2022 Aug 28.
8
Duty to Work During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Study of Perceptions of Health Care Providers in Jordan.COVID-19 大流行期间的工作义务:对约旦卫生保健提供者认知的横断面研究。
J Emerg Nurs. 2022 Sep;48(5):589-602.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jen.2022.04.004.
9
Readiness of Bystander Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (BCPR) during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Review.COVID-19 大流行期间旁观者心肺复苏术(BCPR)的准备情况:综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 2;19(17):10968. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191710968.
10
Workplace Well-Being and Intent to Stay by Health Care Workers Reassigned during the First COVID-19 Wave: Results of a Swiss Survey.新冠疫情第一波期间被重新调配的医护人员的工作场所幸福感和留职意愿:一项瑞士调查的结果。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 26;18(17):8976. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18178976.

本文引用的文献

1
Local public health workers' perceptions toward responding to an influenza pandemic.当地公共卫生工作者对应对流感大流行的看法。
BMC Public Health. 2006 Apr 18;6:99. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-6-99.
2
The willingness of U.S. Emergency Medical Technicians to respond to terrorist incidents.美国紧急医疗技术人员对恐怖事件作出响应的意愿。
Biosecur Bioterror. 2005;3(4):331-7. doi: 10.1089/bsp.2005.3.331.
3
Health care workers' ability and willingness to report to duty during catastrophic disasters.灾难发生期间医护人员报到上班的能力与意愿。
J Urban Health. 2005 Sep;82(3):378-88. doi: 10.1093/jurban/jti086. Epub 2005 Jul 6.
4
Risk perception and impact of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) on work and personal lives of healthcare workers in Singapore: what can we learn?严重急性呼吸综合征(SARS)对新加坡医护人员工作和个人生活的风险认知及影响:我们能学到什么?
Med Care. 2005 Jul;43(7):676-82. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000167181.36730.cc.
5
Capturing a killer flu virus.捕获一种致命流感病毒。
Sci Am. 2005 Jan;292(1):48-57.
6
Emotional and behavioral consequences of bioterrorism: planning a public health response.生物恐怖主义的情绪和行为后果:规划公共卫生应对措施。
Milbank Q. 2004;82(3):413-55, table of contents. doi: 10.1111/j.0887-378X.2004.00317.x.
7
Ethical challenges in preparing for bioterrorism: barriers within the health care system.应对生物恐怖主义准备工作中的伦理挑战:医疗保健系统内部的障碍
Am J Public Health. 2004 Jul;94(7):1096-102. doi: 10.2105/ajph.94.7.1096.
8
Behind the mask. Journey through an epidemic: some observations of contrasting public health responses to SARS.口罩背后。疫情之旅:对非典不同公共卫生应对措施的一些观察
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2003 Nov;57(11):855-6. doi: 10.1136/jech.57.11.855.
9
Smallpox as a biological weapon: medical and public health management. Working Group on Civilian Biodefense.天花作为生物武器:医学与公共卫生管理。民用生物防御工作组。
JAMA. 1999 Jun 9;281(22):2127-37. doi: 10.1001/jama.281.22.2127.
10
Influenza pandemic preparedness plan for the United States.
J Infect Dis. 1997 Aug;176 Suppl 1:S4-7. doi: 10.1086/514174.

急救人员会在大流行期间出勤工作吗?来自护理人员天花疫苗接种调查的经验教训。

Will first-responders show up for work during a pandemic? Lessons from a smallpox vaccination survey of paramedics.

作者信息

Mackler Niklas, Wilkerson William, Cinti Sandro

机构信息

Ann Arbor Hematology Associates PC, Ann Arbor, MI 48105, USA.

出版信息

Disaster Manag Response. 2007 Apr-Jun;5(2):45-8. doi: 10.1016/j.dmr.2007.02.002.

DOI:10.1016/j.dmr.2007.02.002
PMID:17517362
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7110586/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The presence of H5N1 influenza in Southeast Asia has reawakened fears of a worldwide influenza pandemic of the sort that occurred in 1918. It is estimated that up to 1.9 million people in the United States could die if such an outbreak occurs. It is unlikely that a vaccine for a pandemic strain will be available quickly enough to protect first-responders. Similar concerns existed in 2002 when the United States attempted to vaccinate first-responders against smallpox, a potential biologic weapon.

METHOD

We conducted a survey of one group of first-responders, paramedics, to determine if fear of infection would compromise their ability to care for persons potentially infected with smallpox.

RESULTS

Three hundred paramedics were given the survey, and 95 (32%) responded. More than 80% of paramedics polled would not remain on duty if there were no vaccine and no protective gear. Even if protective gear was available but the vaccine was unavailable, only 39% of respondents would remain on duty. Finally, although 91% of paramedics would remain on duty if they were fully protected, this number falls to 38% if the respondent believed that his or her immediate family was not protected. The results of this survey are relevant to current concerns about an influenza pandemic. Every effort must be made to protect first-responders from pandemic influenza and educate them about it.

摘要

背景

东南亚出现的H5N1流感再度引发了人们对类似1918年那种全球流感大流行的恐惧。据估计,如果发生这样的疫情,美国可能有多达190万人死亡。大流行毒株的疫苗不太可能足够快地研制出来以保护急救人员。2002年美国试图为急救人员接种针对天花(一种潜在的生物武器)的疫苗时也存在类似担忧。

方法

我们对一组急救人员——护理人员进行了一项调查,以确定对感染的恐惧是否会影响他们护理可能感染天花人员的能力。

结果

向300名护理人员发放了调查问卷,95人(32%)做出了回应。超过80%接受调查的护理人员表示,如果没有疫苗且没有防护装备,他们不会继续执勤。即使有防护装备但没有疫苗,只有39%的受访者会继续执勤。最后,尽管91%的护理人员在得到充分保护时会继续执勤,但如果受访者认为其直系亲属没有得到保护,这一比例会降至38%。这项调查的结果与当前对流感大流行的担忧相关。必须尽一切努力保护急救人员免受大流行性流感感染,并对他们进行相关教育。