Suppr超能文献

使用六氟化硫(SF6)示踪剂和箱式技术测量奶牛的甲烷排放量。

Methane emissions from dairy cows measured using the sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) tracer and chamber techniques.

作者信息

Grainger C, Clarke T, McGinn S M, Auldist M J, Beauchemin K A, Hannah M C, Waghorn G C, Clark H, Eckard R J

机构信息

Department of Primary Industries, Ellinbank, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

J Dairy Sci. 2007 Jun;90(6):2755-66. doi: 10.3168/jds.2006-697.

Abstract

Our study compared methane (CH4) emissions from lactating dairy cows measured using the sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) tracer and open-circuit respiration chamber techniques. The study was conducted using 16 lactating Holstein-Friesian cows. In each chamber, the cow was fitted with the SF6 tracer apparatus to measure total CH4 emissions, including emissions from the rectum. Fresh ryegrass pasture was harvested daily and fed ad libitum to each cow with a supplement of 5 kg of grain/d. The CH4 emissions measured using the SF6 tracer technique were similar to those using the chamber technique: 331 vs. 322 g of CH4/d per cow. The accuracy of the SF6 tracer technique was indicated by considering the ratio of the CH4 emission measured using the SF6 tracer to the emission measured using the chamber for each cow on each day. The calculated ratio of 102.3% (SE = 1.51) was not different from 100%. A higher variability within cow between days was found for the SF6 tracer technique [coefficient of variation (CV) = 6.1%] than for the chamber technique (CV = 4.3%). The variability among cows was substantially higher than within cows, and was higher for the SF6 technique (CV = 19.6%) than for the chamber technique (CV = 17.8%). Our CH4 emission data were compared with whole-animal chamber studies conducted in Canada and Ireland. In the Canadian study the SF6 technique did not measure CH4 emissions from the rectum and emissions were 8% lower than those measured using the chamber, indicating that emissions from the rectum may be greater than previously measured (1%). The relationship between CH4 emission and dry matter intake was examined for our data and for that reported in the Canadian study. There was a difference in the slopes of the regressions derived from our data and that from Canada; 17.1 vs. 20.8 g of CH4/kg of dry matter intake. A difference between the 2 locations was expected based on the difference in diet composition for these 2 studies. The SF6 tracer technique is reasonably accurate for inventory purposes and for evaluating the effects of mitigation strategies on CH4 emissions.

摘要

我们的研究比较了使用六氟化硫(SF6)示踪剂和开路呼吸室技术测量的泌乳奶牛的甲烷(CH4)排放量。该研究使用了16头泌乳的荷斯坦 - 弗里生奶牛。在每个呼吸室内,给奶牛安装了SF6示踪剂装置以测量总CH4排放量,包括来自直肠的排放量。每天收割新鲜黑麦草牧场并随意喂给每头奶牛,每天补充5千克谷物。使用SF6示踪剂技术测量的CH4排放量与使用呼吸室技术测量的排放量相似:每头奶牛每天分别为331克和322克CH4。通过考虑每天每头奶牛使用SF6示踪剂测量的CH4排放量与使用呼吸室测量的排放量之比,表明了SF6示踪剂技术的准确性。计算得出的比例为102.3%(标准误 = 1.51),与100%没有差异。发现SF6示踪剂技术在奶牛个体间每日的变异性[变异系数(CV)= 6.1%]高于呼吸室技术(CV = 4.3%)。奶牛之间的变异性显著高于奶牛个体内的变异性,并且SF6技术(CV = 19.6%)高于呼吸室技术(CV = 17.8%)。我们的CH4排放数据与在加拿大和爱尔兰进行的全动物呼吸室研究进行了比较。在加拿大的研究中,SF6技术未测量来自直肠的CH4排放量,排放量比使用呼吸室测量的低8%,这表明来自直肠的排放量可能比之前测量的要高(1%)。我们的数据以及加拿大研究报告的数据都对CH4排放与干物质摄入量之间的关系进行了研究。我们的数据和加拿大的数据得出的回归斜率存在差异;分别为每千克干物质摄入量产生17.1克和20.8克CH4。基于这两项研究饮食组成的差异,预计这两个地点之间会存在差异。SF6示踪剂技术在用于清单目的以及评估减排策略对CH4排放的影响方面具有合理的准确性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验