Nagaraja T G, Titgemeyer E C
Department of Diagnostic Medicine and Pathobiology, Kansas State University, Manhattan 66506, USA.
J Dairy Sci. 2007 Jun;90 Suppl 1:E17-38. doi: 10.3168/jds.2006-478.
Ruminal acidosis continues to be a common ruminal digestive disorder in beef cattle and can lead to marked reductions in cattle performance. Ruminal acidosis or increased accumulation of organic acids in the rumen reflects imbalance between microbial production, microbial utilization, and ruminal absorption of organic acids. The severity of acidosis, generally related to the amount, frequency, and duration of grain feeding, varies from acute acidosis due to lactic acid accumulation, to subacute acidosis due to accumulation of volatile fatty acids in the rumen. Ruminal microbial changes associated with acidosis are reflective of increased availability of fermentable substrates and subsequent accumulation of organic acids. Microbial changes in the rumen associated with acute acidosis have been well documented. Microbial changes in subacute acidosis resemble those observed during adaptation to grain feeding and have not been well documented. The decrease in ciliated protozoal population is a common feature of both forms of acidosis and may be a good microbial indicator of an acidotic rumen. Other microbial factors, such as endotoxin and histamine, are thought to contribute to the systemic effects of acidosis. Various models have been developed to assess the effects of variation in feed intake, dietary roughage amount and source, dietary grain amount and processing, step-up regimen, dietary addition of fibrous byproducts, and feed additives. Models have been developed to study effects of management considerations on acidosis in cattle previously adapted to grain-based diets. Although these models have provided useful information related to ruminal acidosis, many are inadequate for detecting responses to treatment due to inadequate replication, low feed intakes by the experimental cattle that can limit the expression of acidosis, and the feeding of cattle individually, which reduces experimental variation but limits the ability of researchers to extrapolate the data to cattle performing at industry standards. Optimal model systems for assessing effects of various management and nutritional strategies on ruminal acidosis will require technologies that allow feed intake patterns, ruminal conditions, and animal health and performance to be measured simultaneously in a large number of cattle managed under conditions similar to commercial feed yards. Such data could provide valuable insight into the true extent to which acidosis affects cattle performance.
瘤胃酸中毒仍然是肉牛常见的瘤胃消化紊乱疾病,会导致牛的生产性能显著下降。瘤胃酸中毒或瘤胃中有机酸积累增加反映了微生物产生、微生物利用和瘤胃对有机酸吸收之间的失衡。酸中毒的严重程度通常与谷物饲喂量、频率和持续时间有关,从因乳酸积累导致的急性酸中毒到因瘤胃中挥发性脂肪酸积累导致的亚急性酸中毒不等。与酸中毒相关的瘤胃微生物变化反映了可发酵底物可用性增加以及随后有机酸的积累。与急性酸中毒相关的瘤胃微生物变化已有充分记录。亚急性酸中毒时的微生物变化类似于适应谷物饲喂期间观察到的变化,尚未得到充分记录。纤毛虫种群减少是两种酸中毒形式的共同特征,可能是酸中毒瘤胃的一个良好微生物指标。其他微生物因素,如内毒素和组胺,被认为会导致酸中毒的全身影响。已经开发了各种模型来评估采食量变化、日粮粗饲料量和来源、日粮谷物量和加工、逐步增加方案、日粮添加纤维副产品以及饲料添加剂的影响。已经开发了模型来研究管理因素对先前适应谷物日粮的牛酸中毒的影响。尽管这些模型提供了与瘤胃酸中毒相关的有用信息,但许多模型由于重复不足、实验牛采食量低(这可能限制酸中毒的表现)以及单独饲喂牛(这减少了实验变异性,但限制了研究人员将数据外推到符合行业标准的牛的能力)而不足以检测对治疗的反应。评估各种管理和营养策略对瘤胃酸中毒影响的最佳模型系统将需要能够在与商业饲养场类似条件下管理的大量牛中同时测量采食量模式、瘤胃状况以及动物健康和生产性能的技术。这些数据可以提供有价值的见解,以了解酸中毒对牛生产性能的真正影响程度。