Han Seung Hyeok, Lee Sang Choel, Ahn Song Vogue, Lee Jung Eun, Kim Dong Ki, Lee Tae Hee, Moon Sung Jin, Kim Beom Seok, Kang Shin-Wook, Choi Kyu Hun, Lee Ho Yung, Han Dae-Suk
Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2007 Sep;22(9):2653-8. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfm242. Epub 2007 May 21.
Loss of residual renal function (RRF) contributes to anaemia, inflammation and malnutrition and is also a strong predictor of mortality in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) patients. However, the role of RRF on peritonitis is not yet clearly established. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of RRF on the development of peritonitis.
Study subjects were 204 end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients who started PD from January 2000 to December 2005. Biochemical and clinical data within 1 month of PD commencement were considered as baseline. To determine risk factors for peritonitis, multivariate Cox regression was performed. Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank test were used to examine the difference of peritonitis-free period according to the presence of diabetes and RRF.
On univariate analysis based on baseline data in first peritonitis, diabetes was less prevalent and RRF (6.7+/-2.6 vs 4.0+/-2.3 ml/min/1.73 m2, P<0.01), haemoglobin (10.9+/-1.2 vs 10.6+/-1.2 g/dl, P<0.05) and serum albumin level (3.6+/-0.4 vs 3.4+/-0.4 g/dl, P<0.01) were significantly higher in the peritonitis-free group. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that time to first PD peritonitis episode was significantly longer in the non-diabetic patients (P<0.001) and in patients with higher residual GFR (P<0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that diabetes [hazard ratio(HR) 1.64, P<0.05] and RRF (per 1 ml/min/1.73 m2 increase, HR 0.81, P<0.01) were independent risk factors.
Our study revealed that RRF and diabetes were risk factors for peritonitis. These results suggest that preservation of RRF should be viewed as a protective strategy to reduce peritonitis.
残余肾功能(RRF)丧失会导致贫血、炎症和营养不良,也是持续性非卧床腹膜透析(CAPD)患者死亡率的有力预测指标。然而,RRF在腹膜炎中的作用尚未明确确立。本研究旨在评估RRF对腹膜炎发生的影响。
研究对象为2000年1月至2005年12月开始进行腹膜透析的204例终末期肾病(ESRD)患者。腹膜透析开始后1个月内的生化和临床数据被视为基线数据。为确定腹膜炎的危险因素,进行了多因素Cox回归分析。采用Kaplan-Meier分析和对数秩检验,根据糖尿病和RRF的存在情况来检验无腹膜炎期的差异。
在首次腹膜炎的基线数据单因素分析中,糖尿病的患病率较低,无腹膜炎组的RRF(6.7±2.6对4.0±2.3 ml/min/1.73 m2,P<0.01)、血红蛋白(10.9±1.2对10.6±1.2 g/dl,P<0.05)和血清白蛋白水平(3.6±0.4对3.4±0.4 g/dl,P<0.01)显著更高。Kaplan-Meier分析显示,非糖尿病患者(P<0.001)和残余肾小球滤过率较高的患者(P<0.001)首次发生腹膜透析腹膜炎事件的时间显著更长。多因素分析显示,糖尿病(风险比[HR] 1.64,P<0.05)和RRF(每增加1 ml/min/1.73 m2,HR 0.81,P<0.01)是独立危险因素。
我们的研究表明,RRF和糖尿病是腹膜炎的危险因素。这些结果提示,保留RRF应被视为降低腹膜炎的一种保护策略。