Suppr超能文献

开发一种用于衡量连通性的调查工具,以评估国家公共卫生防备和应对绩效。

Development of a survey instrument to measure connectivity to evaluate national public health preparedness and response performance.

作者信息

Dorn Barry C, Savoia Elena, Testa Marcia A, Stoto Michael A, Marcus Leonard J

机构信息

Program on Health Care Negotiation and Conflict Resolution, Harvard School of Public Health, 401 Park Dr., Boston, MA 02115, USA.

出版信息

Public Health Rep. 2007 May-Jun;122(3):329-38. doi: 10.1177/003335490712200306.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Survey instruments for evaluating public health preparedness have focused on measuring the structure and capacity of local, state, and federal agencies, rather than linkages among structure, process, and outcomes. To focus evaluation on the latter, we evaluated the linkages among individuals, organizations, and systems using the construct of "connectivity" and developed a measurement instrument.

METHODS

Results from focus groups of emergency preparedness first responders generated 62 items used in the development sample of 187 respondents. Item reduction and factors analyses were conducted to confirm the scale's components.

RESULTS

The 62 items were reduced to 28. Five scales explained 70% of the total variance (number of items, percent variance explained, Cronbach's alpha) including connectivity with the system (8, 45%, 0.94), coworkers (7, 7%, 0.91), organization (7, 12%, 0.93), and perceptions (6, 6%, 0.90). Discriminant validity was found to be consistent with the factor structure.

CONCLUSION

We developed a Connectivity Measurement Tool for the public health workforce consisting of a 34-item questionnaire found to be a reliable measure of connectivity with preliminary evidence of construct validity.

摘要

目的

用于评估公共卫生应急准备情况的调查工具主要侧重于衡量地方、州和联邦机构的结构和能力,而非结构、过程和结果之间的联系。为了将评估重点放在后者上,我们使用“连通性”这一概念对个人、组织和系统之间的联系进行了评估,并开发了一种测量工具。

方法

应急准备一线响应人员焦点小组的结果产生了62个项目,用于187名受访者的开发样本。进行了项目缩减和因素分析以确认量表的组成部分。

结果

62个项目缩减至28个。五个量表解释了总方差的70%(项目数量、解释的方差百分比、克朗巴哈系数),包括与系统的连通性(8个项目,45%,0.94)、同事(7个项目,7%,0.91)、组织(7个项目,12%,0.93)和认知(6个项目,6%,0.90)。发现区分效度与因素结构一致。

结论

我们为公共卫生工作人员开发了一种连通性测量工具,它由一份34个项目的问卷组成,被发现是一种可靠的连通性测量方法,具有结构效度的初步证据。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Meta-leadership and national emergency preparedness: A model to build government connectivity.
Biosecur Bioterror. 2006;4(2):128-34. doi: 10.1089/bsp.2006.4.128.
2
Are public health workers aware of what they don't know?
Biosecur Bioterror. 2005;3(1):31-8. doi: 10.1089/bsp.2005.3.31.
3
Local and state collaboration for effective preparedness planning.地方与州政府为制定有效的应急准备计划而开展合作。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2003 Sep-Oct;9(5):344-51. doi: 10.1097/00124784-200309000-00003.
6
How prepared are Americans for public health emergencies? Twelve communities weigh in.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2004 May-Jun;23(3):201-9. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.23.3.201.
7
Construct validity in psychological tests.心理测试中的结构效度。
Psychol Bull. 1955 Jul;52(4):281-302. doi: 10.1037/h0040957.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验